ارسل ملاحظاتك

ارسل ملاحظاتك لنا







يجب تسجيل الدخول أولا

Power Abuse in Political Discourse: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Trump’s Discourse

المصدر: مجلة الفنون والأدب وعلوم الإنسانيات والاجتماع
الناشر: كلية الإمارات للعلوم التربوية
المؤلف الرئيسي: Qaiwer, Shatha Naiyf (Author)
المجلد/العدد: ع52
محكمة: نعم
الدولة: الإمارات
التاريخ الميلادي: 2020
الشهر: مايو
الصفحات: 326 - 347
DOI: 10.33193/JALHSS.52.2020.93
ISSN: 2616-3810
رقم MD: 1045861
نوع المحتوى: بحوث ومقالات
اللغة: الإنجليزية
قواعد المعلومات: +HumanIndex
مواضيع:
كلمات المؤلف المفتاحية:
Critical Discourse Analysis | Legitimation | Naming | Nominalisation | Political Discourse | Power | Power Abuse
رابط المحتوى:
صورة الغلاف QR قانون

عدد مرات التحميل

23

حفظ في:
المستخلص: This study examines the notion of power abuse in discourse. It presents the linguistic forms used in various expressions where power abuse is evident. It aims to investigate Trump‘s representation of social groups which may involve positive presentation in one context and negative representation in another, thus, providing a detailed account of the way such representation is legitimised. For instance, the analysis reveals how Islam and /or Muslims are named, and how the naming is legitimised and relate to the dichotomies of US and THEM. Accordingly, naming strategies and other linguistic strategies of power abuse are examined to unveil the double-edged ideologies implied within them as we search for ‗inconsistencies in discourse‘ (Wodak and Meyer, 2009).To account for the cognitive aspect of power abuse and exercise in discourse, the researcher draws upon van Dijk‘s (2011) theory of epistemic discourse analysis, theory of discourse and manipulation (Van Dijk,2006) and van Lewueen‘s (2007) frameworks of social actor‘s representation and of legitimation strategies are drawn upon to demystify the manipulative strategies employed in the discourse examined.

ISSN: 2616-3810

عناصر مشابهة