ارسل ملاحظاتك

ارسل ملاحظاتك لنا







يجب تسجيل الدخول أولا

Comparative Study Of The Laws Of Australia And Saudi Arabia Relating Misleading And Deceptive Conduct

المؤلف الرئيسي: Al Mazed, Ahmed (Author)
مؤلفين آخرين: Selvadurai, Niloufer (Advisor)
التاريخ الميلادي: 2010
موقع: سيدني
الصفحات: 1 - 42
رقم MD: 752855
نوع المحتوى: رسائل جامعية
اللغة: الإنجليزية
الدرجة العلمية: رسالة ماجستير
الجامعة: Macquarie University
الكلية: Faculty of Business and Economics
الدولة: أستراليا
قواعد المعلومات: +Dissertations
مواضيع:
رابط المحتوى:

الناشر لهذه المادة لم يسمح بإتاحتها.

صورة الغلاف QR قانون
حفظ في:
المستخلص: Consumers are you, me and every other person and this might explain the importance of the discussion about consumer protection. Nowadays, most people enter into a number of transactions every day such as buying a train ticket, buying groceries, shopping through the Internet and a lot more. Consumers suffer from many acts of unlawful conduct such as misleading or deceptive conduct which according to the ACCC reports has dramatically increased since 2007. This paper aims to compare Australian and Saudi laws in relation to misleading and deceptive conduct by discussing s 52 of the Trade Practices Act 1974 and its corresponding of Saudi law and then studying how the Saudi Consumer Protection Association (SCPA) could benefit from the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission’s (ACCC) experience in its roles in administering the law and regulating the market. It concludes that the Saudi association’s powers are insufficient and doing little in regard to protecting Saudi consumers as they do not enable the SCPA to enforce any measures or directly supervise the market. Therefore, it is suggested that the Association needs to obtain some powers such as those of the ACCC. These would include the power to enter premises and s 155 notices which would allow the Association to really start protecting consumers.