ارسل ملاحظاتك

ارسل ملاحظاتك لنا







الرئيسية > النقد التاريخي عند مؤرخي الترا...>الوصف

النقد التاريخي عند مؤرخي التراجم الشاميين فى القرن الثامن الهجري

العنوان بلغة أخرى: Historical Criticism When Historians Translations Shamian"Syrian" in the Eighth Century AH
المؤلف الرئيسي: ناصر، صفاء شارد (مؤلف)
المؤلف الرئيسي (الإنجليزية): Al-Rikbi, Sifa Sharid Nasir Hussein
مؤلفين آخرين: ضاحي، فاضل جابر (مشرف)
التاريخ الميلادي: 2016
موقع: الكوت
التاريخ الهجري: 1437
الصفحات: 1 - 233
رقم MD: 1009439
نوع المحتوى: رسائل جامعية
اللغة: العربية
الدرجة العلمية: رسالة دكتوراه
الجامعة: جامعة واسط
الكلية: كلية التربية
الدولة: العراق
قواعد المعلومات: Dissertations
مواضيع:
تأريخ التراجم | الشخصيات التاريخية | كتب التراجم | الروايات التاريخية
رابط المحتوى:
صفحة العنوان     
المستخلص     
قائمة المحتويات     
24 صفحة الأولى     

الناشر لهذه المادة لم يسمح بإتاحتها.
صورة الغلاف QR قانون
حفظ في:
المستخلص: The historic criticism, is truly considered one of the significant subjects, which really deserves study and research. It is one of the studies that unveil the historian potency in getting out all ready¬made decisions and to search for historic fact according to researchable pillars, that pillars express on the historians' directions to correct the historic information and laying on for that the critic decisions and rules. Therefore, the criticism is not the A.H.-eighth century, but there were some historians who did proceed the Esh-shami (Damascus) historians in this scope, and who themselves had been tracking on the historians' steps who proceeded them. As far as the importance of this abundant subject in criticism which sprang up its fruits by a lot of writings and corrects the track of others, and making straight more. Therefore, we have made up our minds to limit the research sector just during the A.H. eighth century only, paying the attention on the biographical books in the criticism scopes as easily as for revealing through the historians' tendencies. It is likely a historian may lash out the characters who are against his creed and he may bring on false bibliographies and exaggerated ones against names and characters that might be fabricated and had no relation to reality. Here we have shed some light through narrating historians lives in the A.H eighth century of the same creed and how been effected by the general opinion and authority. It is really considered a good way to know a historian line of working. It is also making questions about the foundation essence, which should be relied on, in order to know the historians' desires and his sect directions. That may be answered through comparing the texts the historian narrated by other historians' text, to get rid of ambiguity and to know the criticism truth which has been directed to a character and supporting or objecting and clearing the criticism reason. This subject is diverse with characters' criticism and writers lately and modernized and bibliography criticism. Pointing out that we have limited the historians who dealt with criticism. Also we do mention the rest of Esh-shami historian in this century especially those who did not find out their writings. Also we do not give a hint to those Esh-shami historians in all their writings by just limited to narrating their writings on the bibliography domain due to the abundance of their writings in other specialty which no referred in the research scope.

This research contains four chapters preceded by an introduction followed by a conclusion with the most distinguished results. The first chapter deals with describing the Esh-shami bibliography historians in the A.H eighth century. In it we have talked about the criticism concept and its birth. Then we shed lights on the Esh-shami bibliography historians. And we come to know their books and clarify the criticism intents for the bibliography historians. The second chapter deals with criticism of the literature, scientific, managing, and political characters. It is highly proper to say that we relied on comparing what we have mentioned of some of the characters written by the Esh-shami historians in the eighth century corresponding to the A.D. fourth century et cetera of the modern historian or to those who lived of the near period to those characters that criticism directed to. While the third chapter encircles around "the criticism to the writings" and the fourth with "The historic narration criticism". Of the most important results reached to here is Esh-shami historians care to the historian criticism as it came of their attention to the modern science. As most of them really care for it but that did not mean that the criticism, which has been used is considered as the modernized criticism but as if these various characters has imposed on them using the historian criticism. Most of their writings in bibliography were footnotes about the writings of those who proceeded them such as al-Siqae, al-Katabi, al-Hussaini, al-Barzali, Ibn-Rajab, al-Salami. All those historians their methods are varied in criticism. For an example, al-Mizi who adopted the opinions in his bibliography criticism, without saying his personal opinions positively or negatively in most cases he dealt. While al-Dhahabi was an extreme critic, getting far from being objective so al-Sabki did criticize him. While al-Safadi was rather balanced in his criticism, with a step closed objectivity, but he is considered more as critic than narrating. And al-Salami was not a critic but interested in valuing the bibliography. And a historian has to know the writer sect who has been taking his narrations in case he revealed a character. As this knowledge may provide him how to deal with the texts narrated by the historian dealt with. Therefore, he would acquire an idea about his intents, and opinions then he will compare it with others of the bibliographies. Through criticizing Esh-shami historians to the modern characters they will obtain the truth of these characters especially al-Safadi criticizing to his century elite and those who connected with relations and knew each other's.

عناصر مشابهة


© 2024 المنظومة. جميع الحقوق محفوظة.