| المستخلص: |
The research tackles two important issues throughout three different sciences. The two issues are: transportation and specialization. The importance of transcription is that the Muslims have accepted it through copying for mind cannot combine between Allah's science that beholds everything that is hidden and alteration that is within the divine judgments so the mind will stop accepting it because the divine perfection needs the legislating divine judgments to be perfect so if we tracked the mind problems, we will find it refusing copying in legislations or starting in the beings. Tackling such an issue is interesting to search about the facts so he will find Allah's wisdom in our existence that the mind cannot speculate, not exiting from the rational balance away from the mind rather than elevating from it. Such a topic -that revels the narrow mind that wants to make one face for perfection- has a rise for another prospect. Through our study for the basics science, we have found that it has developed from its form for the ancients and its form nowadays, especially for the modern of the Imamate. Concerning the question that why we have searched transportations and specialization in three different sciences that are: language, interpretation, and the basics science, it is because the researcher wants to look at the issue in more than one science for he believed in sciences interactions even in that we don't see as interlinked. Pairing between sciences in searching about one matter with different perspectives will give a wide view for the issue. Each science completes the other and opens a number of topics in the other science that will not come to his mind only through pairing in the scientific research between the different sciences. We see this clearly in pairing between philosophy and basics science for many of the Imamate school scholars. All sciences are descendants from one branch that is philosophy, classifying the sciences comes late. We don't mean to deny classification advantages and sorting between sciences, but this may be one of the reasons of sciences development that has been freed from sophistication to balance between all sciences and forces the researchers to certain principals to take them as rules to follow that have become in another time one of the obvious valid things. Even so, combining between the perspectives of two sciences or more for the same issue give good results that won't be reached at when focusing only upon one science.
|
