| المستخلص: |
Acquired the book Fotouh Ibn Asaem Kufi a wide area in the historical studies of this book is of great importance in the transfer news on the one hand and analysis on the other hand, to be historical article of compared to what was brought by other historians, his contemporaries and even his predecessors, or they came after him. In addition, the book Fotouh DAI great prestige to the diversity of historical its information and shedding light on some of the corners that overlooked other, which represents an important episode of Islamic history at the time one of the most periods of the sensitivity of a period of Umayyad rule that had occupied and still occupy historical thought because of the variables large and turns on the political and economic levels, in addition to being representing the height of the conflict between the ends of the political equation, which was born after the death of the prophet and still growing to this day, Valomoin did not distract them during the period of their rule only fend off the upper danger of Bahl hose and sometimes Batballm at other times, and even though this risk does not rise to the level of the Umayyad apprehensive, but they were always put him among the political priorities. This study was to trace the history of political Umayyad through this important book, an attempt to bridge the gaps in the rest of the contemporary sources on the hand and on the other hand to create a more idea of the one universality of the history of the Umayyad through this workbook that DAI interest all Islamic sects for the objectivity and balance rarely find them when another historian of historians of the fourth century AH Although some are trying to classify Ibn Aasem within the shia historians, but this author is still appreciated in historical circles that from the historical article a good not within the broad spectrum of historians in different affiliations. The importance of this study is also being addressed at length and most of the issues faced by the Umayyad to from a comprehensive view of this period through to tracking analytical approach based on the a comparative approach.
Characterized approach of this kind of privacy in response to events , where not only did the Ibn of Aasem pass on novels and either stop at each novel and try as much as possible to make it plain meaning before leaving for a second novel. Despite the extreme disparity between the date of Tabari and history of Ibn Aasem Kufi at the target and the nature of historical writing style, the adoption of Ibn Aasem to tell Dab Mkhanv a large extent in the news the movement of Imam Hussein and the movement of those repent and movement chosen near the notch between them , and that did not obscure the big differences referred to them also. Ibn Aasem historian does not mean the novel but cites historical narrative news normatively market, and tends to revenue verses and texts of speeches and wills in abundance, and all this gave the book a vital private. Even as the Ibn Aasem singled distinctive material from Imam Hussein, the movement is almost the best of his contemporaries wrote about among historians, it was divided in to themes minutes earned recipe analytical distinctive. As the book Fotouh is one of the most important sources for the chosen Obaid bin obead Althagafi revolution, it sheds light on the controversial issue so much , is the nature of the relationship between Abdullan bin Zubair and Mukhtar bin Abi Obead Althagafi. It should be noted the book Fotouh does not include any reference albeit small for (wooden) and (Alkisanih) as well as the (Holy), these things that are characteristics of the revolution of the chosen, and perhaps the realbn for this omission is the result of his feelings towards the Alawites, which led him to overlook the far side of this revolution, Ibn Aasem appears in this book strongly inclined flyover when mention of the Alawites.
|
