ارسل ملاحظاتك

ارسل ملاحظاتك لنا







The Arbitration and Party Autonomy: A Comparative Review between the English Law, the UNCITRAL Model Law and the Qatari Law

المصدر: مجلة كلية القانون الكويتية العالمية
الناشر: كلية القانون الكويتية العالمية
المؤلف الرئيسي: Botosh, Husam (Author)
المجلد/العدد: مج6, ع23
محكمة: نعم
الدولة: الكويت
التاريخ الميلادي: 2018
التاريخ الهجري: 1440
الشهر: سبتمبر
الصفحات: 51 - 71
DOI: 10.54032/2203-006-023-010
ISSN: 2410-2237
رقم MD: 1100369
نوع المحتوى: بحوث ومقالات
اللغة: الإنجليزية
قواعد المعلومات: IslamicInfo
مواضيع:
كلمات المؤلف المفتاحية:
The UK Arbitration Act 1996 | The Qatari Arbitration Act 2017 | The UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration 1985 | Commencement of Arbitration | Party Autonomy
رابط المحتوى:
صورة الغلاف QR قانون

عدد مرات التحميل

15

حفظ في:
LEADER 02609nam a22002297a 4500
001 1841491
024 |3 10.54032/2203-006-023-010 
041 |a eng 
044 |b الكويت 
100 |9 24239  |a Botosh, Husam  |e Author 
245 |a The Arbitration and Party Autonomy:  |b A Comparative Review between the English Law, the UNCITRAL Model Law and the Qatari Law 
260 |b كلية القانون الكويتية العالمية  |c 2018  |g سبتمبر  |m 1440 
300 |a 51 - 71 
336 |a بحوث ومقالات  |b Article 
520 |b "The aim of this paper is to review the position of the UK Arbitration Act 1996, the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration 1985 as well as the new Qatari Arbitration Act 2017 in regards to the commencement of arbitration and the time constraints placed on the party’s during the arbitration and party autonomy. The emphasis of this paper will focus on whether these legal bodies support the rule that parties who submit their international commercial dispute to arbitration are autonomous or not? The paper will also determine which party should be responsible for the commencement of arbitration, whether that is the court, the arbitration panel or both parties. Whilst doing so, the question of why the National courts have restricted party autonomy in domestic arbitration unlike with international arbitration, where party autonomy is unrestricted will be explored in terms of whether this is a justifiable advantage and to be encouraged into the practice of modern arbitrators. Both the party autonomy and commencement of arbitration are examined within the three legal regimes mentioned above. The paper consists of five sections exploring party autonomy; commencement day of arbitration; time restrictions; limitations to court interventions and finally exceptions to court interventions all as apply within the three legal bodies." 
653 |a الأحزاب السياسية  |a القوانين الإنجليزية  |a التشريعات القطرية  |a قانون الأونسيترال 
692 |b The UK Arbitration Act 1996  |b The Qatari Arbitration Act 2017  |b The UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration 1985  |b Commencement of Arbitration  |b Party Autonomy 
773 |4 القانون  |6 Law  |c 010  |e kuwait International law School Journal  |f Mağallaẗ kulliyyaẗ al-qānūn al-kuwaytiyyaẗ al-ʿālamiyyaẗ  |l 023  |m مج6, ع23  |o 2203  |s مجلة كلية القانون الكويتية العالمية  |v 006  |x 2410-2237 
856 |u 2203-006-023-010.pdf 
930 |d y  |p y  |q n 
995 |a IslamicInfo 
999 |c 1100369  |d 1100369