ارسل ملاحظاتك

ارسل ملاحظاتك لنا







يجب تسجيل الدخول أولا

History, Theory and Reoccurring Debates around the Question of Refugee

المصدر: مجلة كلية القانون الكويتية العالمية
الناشر: كلية القانون الكويتية العالمية
المؤلف الرئيسي: Hadad, Dina (Author)
المجلد/العدد: مج6, ع24
محكمة: نعم
الدولة: الكويت
التاريخ الميلادي: 2018
التاريخ الهجري: 1440
الشهر: ديسمبر
الصفحات: 41 - 62
DOI: 10.54032/2203-006-024-011
ISSN: 2410-2237
رقم MD: 1100431
نوع المحتوى: بحوث ومقالات
اللغة: الإنجليزية
قواعد المعلومات: IslamicInfo
مواضيع:
كلمات المؤلف المفتاحية:
Refugees | Constitutionalism | International Law | Schmitt | Human Rights | Homo Sacer
رابط المحتوى:
صورة الغلاف QR قانون

عدد مرات التحميل

7

حفظ في:
المستخلص: The crisis of refugees in recent years presents the international community with one of the most controversial challenges to international human rights. This paper will locate and read this crisis through the lens of Schmitt’s theory and its critique by contemporary theorist. Namely the work of Agamben and his concept of ‘Homo Sacer’ will be used to illustrate its relevance to the ‘stateless’ reality of refugees and the denial of their basic human rights. For this purpose, the German constitution will be reviewed as the set model of Schmitt theory before looking into the reoccurring debates around this theoretical framewrok. This paper argues that the reoccurring of Schmitt and the unfortunate consequences on human rights should be regarded as an alarming development that calls for a reconsideration of international norms to protect refugees’ basic rights and other vulnerable groups due to this practice.

ISSN: 2410-2237

عناصر مشابهة