ارسل ملاحظاتك

ارسل ملاحظاتك لنا







الرئيسية > The Effect of the United State...>مارك

The Effect of the United States’ and Russia’s Veto Power on the UN Security Council’s Ability to Protect Human Rights

المصدر: مجلة كلية القانون الكويتية العالمية
الناشر: كلية القانون الكويتية العالمية
المؤلف الرئيسي: Denny, Marcia (Author)
المجلد/العدد: مج6, ملحق
محكمة: نعم
الدولة: الكويت
التاريخ الميلادي: 2018
التاريخ الهجري: 1439
الشهر: مايو
الصفحات: 141 - 174
DOI: 10.54032/2203-006-991-002
ISSN: 2410-2237
رقم MD: 1100455
نوع المحتوى: بحوث ومقالات
اللغة: الإنجليزية
قواعد المعلومات: IslamicInfo
مواضيع:
حقوق الإنسان | المنظمات الدولية | مجلس الأمن | الأمم المتحدة | روسيا
رابط المحتوى:
PDF (صورة)     
صورة الغلاف QR قانون

عدد مرات التحميل

12

حفظ في:
LEADER 03331nam a22002177a 4500
001 1841568
024 |3 10.54032/2203-006-991-002 
041 |a eng 
044 |b الكويت 
100 |9 592167  |a Denny, Marcia  |e Author 
245 |a The Effect of the United States’ and Russia’s Veto Power on the UN Security Council’s Ability to Protect Human Rights 
260 |b كلية القانون الكويتية العالمية  |c 2018  |g مايو  |m 1439 
300 |a 141 - 174 
336 |a بحوث ومقالات  |b Article 
520 |b This paper examines whether the exercise of the veto power by the United States and Russia, in recent times, has inhibited or limited the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) in the performance of its mandated functions. In particular, the paper focuses on whether the veto action of these permanent UNSC members has, in fact, caused a continuation of, if not exacerbation of, human rights abuses or humanitarian crises in Syria and the Occupied Palestinian Territories. United Nations leaders, including Secretary-General Antonio Guterres and UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, Prince Zeid Ra’ad Al Hussein of Jordan, have emphasized that the exercise and enforcement of human rights guarantees are essential for international peace and security to be achieved. They recognize that human rights protection must be obtained through the enforcement actions of the United Nations Security Council. If the Council is unable or unwilling to act in the face of mass atrocities as a result of the use of the veto power of the permanent five members, then the Council itself becomes an actor in the perpetuation of those atrocities. The paper looks briefly at the mandate for human rights protection contained within the UN Charter, including a brief summary of the Charter organs’ obligations in this regard. Primary focus is on the UN Security Council’s obligation to secure and maintain international peace and whether or not that entails the duty to protect human rights. With that in mind, an analysis of the way in which the UNSC’s permanent members use the veto power ensues. An examination of why they use the veto and with what result is undertaken, particularly as to Russia in Syria and the United States in the Occupied Palestinian Territories (also referred to as Palestine herein). In addition, currently advanced solutions to the veto-power dilemma will be briefly analyzed including – (1) renewed application of the obligatory abstention rule of UN Charter Article 27, paragraph 3; (2) voluntary veto abstention as an obligation of the P5 in situations involving genocide and large-scale human rights abuses in coordination with the responsibility to protect; and (3) renewed use of the UN General Assembly’s Uniting for Peace Resolution No. 377A of November 3, 1950." 
653 |a حقوق الإنسان  |a المنظمات الدولية  |a مجلس الأمن  |a الأمم المتحدة  |a روسيا 
773 |4 القانون  |6 Law  |c 002  |e kuwait International law School Journal  |f Mağallaẗ kulliyyaẗ al-qānūn al-kuwaytiyyaẗ al-ʿālamiyyaẗ  |l 991  |m مج6, ملحق  |o 2203  |s مجلة كلية القانون الكويتية العالمية  |v 006  |x 2410-2237 
856 |u 2203-006-991-002.pdf 
930 |d y  |p y  |q n 
995 |a IslamicInfo 
999 |c 1100455  |d 1100455 

عناصر مشابهة


© 2024 المنظومة. جميع الحقوق محفوظة.