| المستخلص: |
The report aims to explain the term "anti- Semitism" and explores the historical background and appearance reasons. The report discusses the practical definition of "anti - Semitism" issued by the" international coalition to revive the memory of the Holocaust IHRA "in 2016. It analyzes the problems and ambiguities in its connotations, especially in the optimal for its posed illustrations, including the monitors report criticism of the broad definition and the effects of its adoption on the freedoms at academic and political levels concerning the Arab/Palestinian - Israeli conflict. The report concluded that: * The term "anti - Semitism "reflects Bach all the more precisely about the phenomenon of anti- Semitism; "It is also a modem term that appeared in the late quarter of the nineteenth century in Europe. It highlights the historical causes of the phenomenon of anti - Semitism" in Europe and its manifestations on different discrimination behaviors, the most notably in the modern era was the" Holocaust". * The "practical definition of anti-Semitism "especially its illustrative examples ‘faces widespread criticism, most notably are: - It negatively affects the democratic countries regarding the freedom of expression and academic research. - Preconception between the Jews because they are followers of a religion or being a group of ethnic, and Israeli discrimination against other Semitic peoples as Arabs with significant behaviors. - It confuses "anti-Semitism" with "anti-Zionism". - A broad definition is being used by Israel and its lobby groups worldwide to equate criticism of Israeli state policies with" anti- Semitism." - Israel supporters use this terminology to silence dissenting voices to Israel and fortify its racist policies against the Palestinian people from criticism. The legal and moral justifications that lead to confronting "anti-Semitism" are the same that lead to confrontation these Israeli policies. The report warns against adopting this definition after the increase in normalization between Israel and Arab countries. The memorandum of understanding between the Kingdom of Bahrain and the United States on combating "anti-Semitism" according to the "practical definition of anti- Semitism" signals the warning eligibility. The report iterates that it creates confusion and fallacies that serve the Israeli occupation and its approach to the region. It would cause many foggy international understandings of the Palestinian people's legitimate rights. The report confirms that any such memorandum of this kind constitutes a fracture in the Arab consensus. It works biasedly to favor the Israeli narrative and hostility to the Palestinian people in their occupied territories.
|
