ارسل ملاحظاتك

ارسل ملاحظاتك لنا







Revisiting Self-Determination in Light of Recent Changes: The Cases of Catalonia and Kurdistan

المصدر: مجلة كلية القانون الكويتية العالمية
الناشر: كلية القانون الكويتية العالمية
المؤلف الرئيسي: Yassine, Farah (Author)
المجلد/العدد: مج6, ملحق
محكمة: نعم
الدولة: الكويت
التاريخ الميلادي: 2018
التاريخ الهجري: 1440
الشهر: أكتوبر
الصفحات: 33 - 61
DOI: 10.54032/2203-006-998-007
ISSN: 2410-2237
رقم MD: 1100580
نوع المحتوى: بحوث ومقالات
اللغة: الإنجليزية
قواعد المعلومات: IslamicInfo
مواضيع:
كلمات المؤلف المفتاحية:
Self-Determination | Secession | Catalonia | Kurdistan | Decolonization | Declaration of Independence
رابط المحتوى:
صورة الغلاف QR قانون

عدد مرات التحميل

7

حفظ في:
LEADER 02429nam a22002297a 4500
001 1841697
024 |3 10.54032/2203-006-998-007 
041 |a eng 
044 |b الكويت 
100 |9 535201  |a Yassine, Farah  |e Author 
245 |a Revisiting Self-Determination in Light of Recent Changes:  |b The Cases of Catalonia and Kurdistan 
260 |b كلية القانون الكويتية العالمية  |c 2018  |g أكتوبر  |m 1440 
300 |a 33 - 61 
336 |a بحوث ومقالات  |b Article 
520 |b Self-determination of peoples was long associated with decolonization, and perceived as a legal ground for claiming independence against oppression and illegal occupation. However, its main orientation has currently shifted from promoting decolonization to fostering secession. The detractors of external self-determination find it irreconcilable with the principles of sovereignty and territorial integrity that require the consent of the mother country, as declarations of independence might alter the sovereign territory of the state and its delimited borders. International law remains unclear regarding the implementation of the right to external self-determination and whether it should cover secession. In the absence of clear interpretative measures, states can refer to their constitutional law. The right to self-determination requires indeed the reference to international and national norms for a case by case assessment. Hence, this paper will analyze the current state of the right to self-determination to suggest some criteria for remedial secession. These criteria will be applied in light of recent changes and events focusing on the current implementation of self-determination in the cases of Catalonia and Kurdistan, to conclude that the latter do not appear to be entitled to secede." 
653 |a تقرير المصير  |a القوانين الدولية  |a الحدود السياسية  |a النضال السياسي 
692 |b Self-Determination  |b Secession  |b Catalonia  |b Kurdistan  |b Decolonization  |b Declaration of Independence 
773 |4 القانون  |6 Law  |c 007  |e kuwait International law School Journal  |f Mağallaẗ kulliyyaẗ al-qānūn al-kuwaytiyyaẗ al-ʿālamiyyaẗ  |l 998  |m مج6, ملحق  |o 2203  |s مجلة كلية القانون الكويتية العالمية  |v 006  |x 2410-2237 
856 |u 2203-006-998-007.pdf 
930 |d y  |p y  |q n 
995 |a IslamicInfo 
999 |c 1100580  |d 1100580 

عناصر مشابهة