| المستخلص: |
لقد حرز الإمام أبو عبد الرحمن أحمد بن شعيب بن علي النسائي مكانة كبيرة في الحديث وعلم الرجال والعلل، فمن كتبه التي أصبحت مرجعا من مراجع الإسلام وواحد من دواوين السنة الشريفة كتاب السنن. وامتاز في كتابه السنن بقوة شرطه وانتقاءه للرجال حتى أنه نزل في جملة من الأحاديث لأنها لم تكن على شرطه. ومن الكتب التي امتاز بها الإمام النسائي كتاب: "خصائص علي بن أبي طالب رضي الله عنه" فصنفه عندما دخل دمشق ووجد المنحرفين عن علي رضي الله عنه، ولم يكن رضي الله عنه شيعياً وإنما كان سنياً على عقيدة أهل السنة والجماعة في الاعتقاد والاستدلال. وقد امتاز في كتابه الخصائص بمعالم كثيرة في الإسناد والمتن وسياق الروايات ونقدها، فمن تلك المعالم: انتقاء الشيوخ فقل أن تجد منهم متكلم فيه، وأيضا: دقته في صيغ الأداء في الرواية عن شيوخه. بيانه لمن أبهم من الرواة سواء كان من شيوخ شيوخه أو تابع التابعي أو حتى صحابي. تجد من منهجه في سياق الروايات تقديم الرواية الصحيحة ثم يذكر الضعيفة وهو الأكثر، وربما عكس ذلك. الاعتناء بذكر المتابعات والشواهد لحديث الباب. وقد تنوعت أحاديثه: فمنها ما كان على شرط الشيخين أو أحدهما، ومنها التي على شرطه، ومنها الضعيفة، وقد يصل إلى ما كان فيها نكارة. وامتاز كتابه بنقد الروايات، فيعلل بالمخالفة، وبالانقطاع، وبالجهالة، وبالخلاف.
The approach of Imam al-Nasa'i in his book The Characteristics of Ali bin Abi Talib, may God be pleased with him, Imam Abu Abd al Rahman Ahmad bin Shuaib bin Ali Al-Nasa’i scored a great position in the hadith, the science of men and ills, for his books, which became a reference from the references of Islam and one of the collections of the noble Sunnah, the book of Sunan. And he was distinguished in his book Al-Sunan with the strength of his condition and his selection of men, so he went down in a number of hadiths because they were not on his condition. Among the books that Imam Al-Nasa’i distinguished from the book: “The Characteristics of Ali bin Abi Talib” So he classified it when he entered Damascus and found the deviants from Ali, and he was not - may God have mercy on him - a Shiite, but he was a Sunni on the belief of the Sunnis and the community in belief and reason. In his book, he distinguished himself with many features in the chain of transmission, the text, the context of narrations and criticism, among which are: Selecting elders, say that you find them speaking in it, and also: its accuracy in formulas for performance in the narration on its elders. His statement to one of the narrators of the narrators, whether he is from the elders of his elders or a follower of the follower or even a companion. You find one of his methods in the context of novels to present the correct narration and then mention the weak, which is the most, and perhaps the opposite. Take care to mention the follow-up and evidence of the hadith chapter. And his hadiths varied: some of them were not on the condition of the two sheikhs, or one of them, and some of them were on his condition, and some of them were weak, and he may reach what was in it an evil. His book was distinguished for criticizing novels, and he explains the violation, discontinuity, ignorance, and disagreement.
|
