ارسل ملاحظاتك

ارسل ملاحظاتك لنا







الأصول التشريعية للتعسف في استعمال الحق: دراسة تحليلية في ضوء مقاصد الشريعة الإسلامية

العنوان بلغة أخرى: Legislative Origins of Arbitrariness of the Right: An Analytical Study in Light of the Purposes of Islamic Sharia
المصدر: مجلة البحوث الفقهية المعاصرة
الناشر: مؤسسة البحوث والدراسات الفقهية وعلوم القرآن الكريم الوقفية
المؤلف الرئيسي: مرجي، أمل سمير نزال (مؤلف)
المؤلف الرئيسي (الإنجليزية): Marji, Amal Sameer Nazzal
المجلد/العدد: مج32, ع117
محكمة: نعم
الدولة: السعودية
التاريخ الميلادي: 2020
التاريخ الهجري: 1442
الشهر: أغسطس
الصفحات: 201 - 277
ISSN: 1319-0792
رقم MD: 1165674
نوع المحتوى: بحوث ومقالات
اللغة: العربية
قواعد المعلومات: IslamicInfo
مواضيع:
رابط المحتوى:
صورة الغلاف QR قانون
حفظ في:
المستخلص: 1- Arbitrariness is a principle in itself based on legislative principles such as the filling of pretexts and approval, as well as legitimate principles such as the principle of motivation and tricks. 2- The principle of arbitrariness is confirmed by the jurisprudential rules that clarified the principle of arbitrariness in the use of the right. 3- The principle of arbitrariness in the use of the right to Islamic jurisprudence is based on three fundamentals: the first is whether the individual uses his right, which is intended only to harm others, and has no interest in it. The second is that the human being should use a right intended to achieve a legitimate purpose other than the purpose set by the legislator. 4- The Almighty’s wisdom and mercy that have been manifested in making the act of truth a wise and legitimate purpose without harming the parties: the right holder and others, taking into account the legal limits and rules. 5- Enriching Jurisprudential chapters with examples indicating the prevention of arbitrariness in the use of the personal right and making the right a dual quality that does not relate only to the individual or to society, but is in the interest of both parties. 6- The preventive and therapeutic role of arbitrariness in the use of the right is evident through the realization of the subjective or motivating criterion. As well as by the objective criterion of the results and mechanisms of acts. The theory of the expected and actual harm, and the provision of solutions and procedures.

ISSN: 1319-0792