The CFSP as an Aspect of Conducting Foreign Relations by the United Kingdom with Special Reference to the Treaty of Amity & Cooperation in Southeast Asia
| المصدر: | المجلة الدولية للقانون |
|---|---|
| الناشر: | جامعة قطر - كلية القانون |
| المؤلف الرئيسي: | Seah, Daniel (Author) |
| المجلد/العدد: | مج4, ع1 |
| محكمة: | نعم |
| الدولة: |
قطر |
| التاريخ الميلادي: |
2015
|
| الصفحات: | 1 - 20 |
| ISSN: |
2223-859x |
| رقم MD: | 1196642 |
| نوع المحتوى: | بحوث ومقالات |
| اللغة: | الإنجليزية |
| قواعد المعلومات: | Open, IslamicInfo |
| مواضيع: | |
| كلمات المؤلف المفتاحية: |
ASEAN | EU Law | International Law | CFSP | Treaty | UK Foreign Relations
|
| رابط المحتوى: |
PDF (صورة)
[مفتوح]
|
عدد مرات التحميل
1
| LEADER | 02230nam a22002297a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1942775 | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 044 | |b قطر | ||
| 100 | |9 640447 |a Seah, Daniel |e Author | ||
| 245 | |a The CFSP as an Aspect of Conducting Foreign Relations by the United Kingdom with Special Reference to the Treaty of Amity & Cooperation in Southeast Asia | ||
| 260 | |b جامعة قطر - كلية القانون |c 2015 | ||
| 300 | |a 1 - 20 | ||
| 336 | |a بحوث ومقالات |b Article | ||
| 520 | |b Since the Lisbon Treaty’s entry into force in 2009, the Common & Foreign Security Policy (CFSP) retains its intergovernmental character, although its legal status is no longer separate from but part of a single European Union (EU) framework. With particular focus on the United Kingdom’s practice as a EU member state, this article examines the potential pressures which bear on the interplay between: (i) the CFSP’s intergovernmental character; and (ii) the CFSP’s current legal status within a single EU framework that established a semblance of institutional coherence; and (iii) the implications for conducting the UK’s foreign relations, a consequence of its status at international law as an independent sovereign state. The article argues that pressures arise for the UK because of its legal obligations under UK law, EU law and international law, which potentially interlock, as distinct sources of law, with consequences for the flexible conduct of British foreign relations. This argument is illustrated through the case study of accession by the UK and EU (of which the UK is a member state), two separate legal persons at international law, to the Treaty of Amity and Cooperation in Southeast Asia. | ||
| 653 | |a معاهدة لشبونة |a العلاقات الدولية |a القانون الدولي |a بريطانيا |a جنوب شرق آسيا | ||
| 692 | |b ASEAN |b EU Law |b International Law |b CFSP |b Treaty |b UK Foreign Relations | ||
| 773 | |c 001 |e International Review of Law |f al-Mağallaẗ al-duwaliyyaẗ al-qānūn |l 001 |m مج4, ع1 |o 2284 |s المجلة الدولية للقانون |v 004 |x 2223-859x | ||
| 856 | |u 2284-004-001-001.pdf | ||
| 930 | |d y |p y |q n | ||
| 995 | |a Open | ||
| 995 | |a IslamicInfo | ||
| 999 | |c 1196642 |d 1196642 | ||
عناصر مشابهة
-
The Southeast Asia Collective Defence Treaty
بواسطة: Chaudhri, Mohammad Ahsen منشور: (1964) -
من المعاهدة الدستورية إلى معاهدة لشبونة ( جدول المفاوضات )
بواسطة: جاكيه، جان بول منشور: (2008) -
معاهدة لشبونة هل هي بالنسبة للاتحاد الأوروبي خروج من أزمة أم أكثر من ذلك ؟
بواسطة: أوبردورف، هنري منشور: (2008) -
The Arrival of Islam and the Development of Islamic Culture in Southeast Asia: An Historical Approach
بواسطة: Bentahcene, Badrane منشور: (2008) -
The Moscow Test Ban Treaty
بواسطة: Shaker, Mohamed Ibrahim منشور: (1971)
