ارسل ملاحظاتك

ارسل ملاحظاتك لنا







الرئيسية > Sovereign Wealth Funds:>مارك
يجب تسجيل الدخول أولا

Sovereign Wealth Funds: Investors in Search of an Identity in the Twenty-First Century

المصدر: المجلة الدولية للقانون
الناشر: جامعة قطر - كلية القانون
المؤلف الرئيسي: Hsu, Locknie (Author)
المجلد/العدد: مج4, ع2
محكمة: نعم
الدولة: قطر
التاريخ الميلادي: 2015
الصفحات: 1 - 14
ISSN: 2223-859x
رقم MD: 1196754
نوع المحتوى: بحوث ومقالات
اللغة: الإنجليزية
قواعد المعلومات: Open, IslamicInfo
مواضيع:
صناديق الثروة السيادية | الاستثمارات الأجنبية | الإنفتاح الاقتصادي | القوانين والتشريعات
كلمات المؤلف المفتاحية:
Sovereign Wealth Funds | State-Owned Enterprises | Free Trade Agreements | Trans-Pacific Partnership
رابط المحتوى:
PDF (صورة)      [مفتوح]
صورة الغلاف QR قانون

عدد مرات التحميل

8

حفظ في:
LEADER 02956nam a22002297a 4500
001 1942870
041 |a eng 
044 |b قطر 
100 |9 640519  |a Hsu, Locknie  |e Author 
245 |a Sovereign Wealth Funds:  |b Investors in Search of an Identity in the Twenty-First Century 
260 |b جامعة قطر - كلية القانون  |c 2015 
300 |a 1 - 14 
336 |a بحوث ومقالات  |b Article 
520 |b Sovereign Wealth Funds (SWFs), as they have come to be known, are a hybrid type of foreign investor. They invest beyond their own borders with an aim to maximize returns as a foreign investor is expected to. At the same time, they are closely associated with governments, by ownership, source of funding, and/or investment objectives. Even as within this group, individual SWFs take various forms and may have divergent investment priorities and risk approaches. There is not even a universal definition of SWFs. As a result, they are often not viewed as typical foreign investors. The association of a SWF with a foreign government has raised various issues such as national security, trade protectionism and nationalism in the recipient countries. At the same time, due to the government ownership of some SWFs, they may fall into the group of business entities known as state-owned enterprises (SOEs). Given that SOEs are highly influential in some states, some recipient states have sought to subject SOEs to greater disciplines, such as in ensuring competition law and transparency principles apply to them, in order to level the playing field for other enterprises. Such disciplines have begun to appear in trade and investment treaties, and are coupled with the usual broad definitions of “investor” in such treaties. It is perhaps too early to state that there is a trend of greater legal and cross-border scrutiny over SOEs, and along with them, SWFs, in treaties. The Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement that is under negotiation is an example of a potentially game-changing treaty which could affect SWFs qua SOEs. The challenge for SWFs is to carve a distinct identity in the twenty-first century, as more treaties that impose binding requirements arise. This article examines some recent developments, how SWFs may need to forge a unique identity and challenges of recipient states in balancing investment openness and the above concerns. 
653 |a صناديق الثروة السيادية  |a الاستثمارات الأجنبية  |a الإنفتاح الاقتصادي  |a القوانين والتشريعات 
692 |b Sovereign Wealth Funds  |b State-Owned Enterprises  |b Free Trade Agreements  |b Trans-Pacific Partnership 
773 |c 003  |e International Review of Law  |f al-Mağallaẗ al-duwaliyyaẗ al-qānūn  |l 002  |m مج4, ع2  |o 2284  |s المجلة الدولية للقانون  |v 004  |x 2223-859x 
856 |u 2284-004-002-003.pdf 
930 |d y  |p y  |q n 
995 |a Open 
995 |a IslamicInfo 
999 |c 1196754  |d 1196754 

عناصر مشابهة


© 2024 المنظومة. جميع الحقوق محفوظة.