ارسل ملاحظاتك

ارسل ملاحظاتك لنا







الرئيسية > Sovereign Wealth Funds:>مارك
يجب تسجيل الدخول أولا

Sovereign Wealth Funds: Problems of International Law between Possessing and Recipient States

المصدر: المجلة الدولية للقانون
الناشر: جامعة قطر - كلية القانون
المؤلف الرئيسي: Nakatani, Kazuhiro (Author)
المجلد/العدد: مج4, ع2
محكمة: نعم
الدولة: قطر
التاريخ الميلادي: 2015
الصفحات: 1 - 13
ISSN: 2223-859x
رقم MD: 1196761
نوع المحتوى: بحوث ومقالات
اللغة: الإنجليزية
قواعد المعلومات: Open, IslamicInfo
مواضيع:
صناديق الثروة السيادية | الاستثمارات الأجنبية | السياسات الاقتصادية | القانون الدولي | القوانين والتشريعات
كلمات المؤلف المفتاحية:
Sovereign Wealth Funds | International Law | Restrictions on Foreign Investment | Sovereign Immunity | Taxation | Responsible Investment
رابط المحتوى:
PDF (صورة)      [مفتوح]
صورة الغلاف QR قانون

عدد مرات التحميل

7

حفظ في:
LEADER 03184nam a22002297a 4500
001 1942871
041 |a eng 
044 |b قطر 
100 |9 640520  |a Nakatani, Kazuhiro  |e Author 
245 |a Sovereign Wealth Funds:  |b Problems of International Law between Possessing and Recipient States 
260 |b جامعة قطر - كلية القانون  |c 2015 
300 |a 1 - 13 
336 |a بحوث ومقالات  |b Article 
520 |b As the influence of Sovereign Wealth Funds (SWFs) is increasing in the world economy, the legal problems between the possessing States and recipient States become very important. The famous Santiago Principles are self-pledges of the governance and activities of SWFs by the possessing States and do not regulate the legal problems between the possessing States and the recipient States. This article considers the following relevant problems from the point of international law: (A) restrictions on foreign investment, (B) sovereign immunity, (C) taxation and (D) responsible investment. As to (A), although restrictions on foreign investment for national security reasons is generally permitted under international law, they should be guided by the principles of non-discrimination, transparency of policies and predictability of outcomes, proportionality of measures and accountability of implementing authorities. As to (B), when SWFs are involved in a civil action concerning holding shares in a company, they cannot enjoy jurisdictional immunity. This is because holding shares come under participation on companies in the United Nations Convention on Jurisdictional Immunities of States and Their Property. As to (C), there is no established rule of customary international law whether SWFs are granted exemption from taxation in recipient States. State practice is mixed. Some States including Japan do not categorically grant exemption from taxation to SWFs, but grant it to specific SWFs based on bilateral tax treaties. As to (D), Norway’s Government Pension Fund Global and New Zealand Superannuation Fund are faithful to the method of responsible investment. The heart of its responsible investment lies in the disinvetement and negative screening in particular. The disinvestment does not constitute unlawful intervention under international law. Finally, the balance of interests between the possessing States and the recipient States has to be kept in order to attain an equitable result. The concept of equity, although somewhat ambiguous, can play an important role in this field. 
653 |a صناديق الثروة السيادية  |a الاستثمارات الأجنبية  |a السياسات الاقتصادية  |a القانون الدولي  |a القوانين والتشريعات 
692 |b Sovereign Wealth Funds  |b International Law  |b Restrictions on Foreign Investment  |b Sovereign Immunity  |b Taxation  |b Responsible Investment 
773 |c 004  |e International Review of Law  |f al-Mağallaẗ al-duwaliyyaẗ al-qānūn  |l 002  |m مج4, ع2  |o 2284  |s المجلة الدولية للقانون  |v 004  |x 2223-859x 
856 |u 2284-004-002-004.pdf 
930 |d y  |p y  |q n 
995 |a Open 
995 |a IslamicInfo 
999 |c 1196761  |d 1196761 

عناصر مشابهة


© 2024 المنظومة. جميع الحقوق محفوظة.