ارسل ملاحظاتك

ارسل ملاحظاتك لنا







Searching for Purpose: Critical Assessment of Teleological Interpretation of Treaties in Investment Arbitration

المصدر: المجلة الدولية للقانون
الناشر: جامعة قطر - كلية القانون
المؤلف الرئيسي: Djajic, Sanja (Author)
المجلد/العدد: مج5, ع3
محكمة: نعم
الدولة: قطر
التاريخ الميلادي: 2017
الصفحات: 1 - 28
ISSN: 2223-859x
رقم MD: 1196902
نوع المحتوى: بحوث ومقالات
اللغة: الإنجليزية
قواعد المعلومات: Open, IslamicInfo
مواضيع:
كلمات المؤلف المفتاحية:
Treaty Interpretation | Investment Arbitration | Teleological Interpretation
رابط المحتوى:
صورة الغلاف QR قانون

عدد مرات التحميل

2

حفظ في:
LEADER 02625nam a22002297a 4500
001 1943005
041 |a eng 
044 |b قطر 
100 |9 640597  |a Djajic, Sanja  |e Author 
245 |a Searching for Purpose:  |b Critical Assessment of Teleological Interpretation of Treaties in Investment Arbitration 
260 |b جامعة قطر - كلية القانون  |c 2017 
300 |a 1 - 28 
336 |a بحوث ومقالات  |b Article 
520 |b This article explores the tendency of investment tribunals to resort to teleological interpretation and to the protection and promotion of foreign investments as a standard goal of investment treaties. It further explores how this tendency relates to the rule of interpretation envisaged in Articles 31–33 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties considering that the convention rule requires that text, context, and purpose are to be equally assessed when searching for the meaning of a treaty provision. The article’s particular focus is on whether investment tribunals have begun to create specific rules for interpreting investment treaties that favor one of the elements of interpretation over the others, namely, the purpose of the treaty. This method of teleological interpretation is set against the general background of investment arbitration, the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, and cases where investment tribunals’ reliance on the preamble of the applicable treaty was decisive for the final outcome of the case. These cases, which revolved around the goal to protect and promote foreign investments and teleological interpretation, lend support to the proposition that there has been a departure from the general rule. However, they equally show the unreliability of telos in a treaty: purposes may be different, even conflicting, and their clear meaning can easily escape interpreters. Despite a growing number of cases where the purpose of a treaty comes to the forefront of legal reasoning, the functional correlation between the purpose of a treaty and the legitimacy of a claim still remains unclear. 
653 |a الاستثمارات الأجنبية  |a التحكيم التجاري  |a القانون الدولي  |a القوانين والتشريعات 
692 |b Treaty Interpretation  |b Investment Arbitration  |b Teleological Interpretation 
773 |c 004  |e International Review of Law  |f al-Mağallaẗ al-duwaliyyaẗ al-qānūn  |l 003  |m مج5, ع3  |o 2284  |s المجلة الدولية للقانون  |v 005  |x 2223-859x 
856 |u 2284-005-003-004.pdf 
930 |d y  |p y  |q n 
995 |a Open 
995 |a IslamicInfo 
999 |c 1196902  |d 1196902 

عناصر مشابهة