ارسل ملاحظاتك

ارسل ملاحظاتك لنا







الرئيسية > التعريف بالإبهام عند المحدثين...>الوصف

التعريف بالإبهام عند المحدثين

العنوان المترجم: The Definition of Ambiguity According to The Hadith Scholars
المصدر: مجلة جامعة تكريت للعلوم الإنسانية
الناشر: جامعة تكريت - كلية التربية للعلوم الإنسانية
المؤلف الرئيسي: الطالباني، كيلان محمد فاتح (مؤلف)
مؤلفين آخرين: العزاوي، مقداد خزعل أحمد علي (م. مشارك)
المجلد/العدد: مج25, ع9
محكمة: نعم
الدولة: العراق
التاريخ الميلادي: 2018
الصفحات: 24 - 48
ISSN: 1817-6798
رقم MD: 1210145
نوع المحتوى: بحوث ومقالات
اللغة: العربية
قواعد المعلومات: HumanIndex
مواضيع:
المحدثون القدماء | الكتاب والسنة | الأحاديث النبوية
كلمات المؤلف المفتاحية:
albahth fi alhadith | alnubawii alsharif | alaibham eind almhdthin
رابط المحتوى:

الناشر لهذه المادة لم يسمح بإتاحتها.
صورة الغلاف QR قانون
حفظ في:
المستخلص: Thank God I have come to my conclusion through my research on the vagueness in Imam Ahmad ibn Hanbal'sMusnad's the first part to the results that I’m going to state through the following points: 1- vagueness in narrating make them of the type of return, which is one of the causes of weakness, because the narrator is unknown of what we do not know about his fairness and control. the narration remainsweak unless the vagueness is revealed or strengthened by another narration and this opinion of the public of religion scientists. 2- There are some types of vagueness where it does not harm the narration and do not weaken, which is the vagueness of the Companions on the opinion of the publics (the public of religion scientists), and the heads of the group, and vagueness in the basic narration. 3- Not to accept the narration of the amendment on the vagueness unless it is named, and case is known the followers of the criticizism and modification, and this is based on the opinion of the publics. 4- The interest of religion scientists a lot of knowledge of vagueness and detection, especially the vagueness in the support, so the religion scientists in ancient and modern, and the reason is that the vagueness affects the acceptance of the narration and its response. 5- Through my reading I did not find a book of modern books only signed by the vagueness, whether of the types of vagueness-return, or other types that do not harm the narration. 6- The rule of attribution in which the vagueness is connected is vague, and this is the opinion of the public. 7- do not judge the Hadith, which is based on the principle of weakness, unless the search to find, if we not find them after inspection then we can judge the narration weakness and interruption, or ignorance of the narrator. 8- The case of the anonymous narrator is not revealed unless it comes from another way, either from the narrator who narrated the hadeeth, or from another narrator, and the ambiguity is also revealed if the pronunciation of the vagueness is known by the scholars of the biography and translations. 9- If the narration remains on the vagueness then be of the types of the weak and strengthen others if it came other ways to force it and support it to the degree of good support for others. 10- There are a number of Hadiths cannot reveal the vagueness of the Support, and the inability of the major critics to explore. 11- The need to study the vague evidence to find out what strengthens the narration to increase the degree of evidence in the truthiness and weakness

يحتاج استكشاف الروايات المبهمة إلى علم الإبهام، لذا أردت أن أضع أساسا لطلبة العلم حول علم الإبهام لأني لم أجد من فصل في هذا العلم تفصيلا شافيا، فهو مفرق في كتب العلماء حيث يصعب على مريدي هذا العلم أن يقرأه متفرقا بين مطول ومقصر وإن كنت - لقصر باعي وقلة اطلاعي - لست من فرسان هذا الشأن، ولا ممن يجول في هذا الميدان، ممن خاضوا غماره وجمعوا صغاره وكباره، ولكني أحببت أن أقدح معهم بزند وأرمي بسهم واستضىء بنور ما اقتبسوا، وأقتطف من ثمار ما غرسوا؛ وأنقل ذلك من كتبهم وأقفو أثرهم تشبها بهم.
ISSN: 1817-6798

عناصر مشابهة


© 2024 المنظومة. جميع الحقوق محفوظة.