| المستخلص: |
تتصدى هذه الدراسة لصورة واحد من أشهر مؤرخي الإسلام في العصر الوسيط ألا وهو ابن جرير الطبري(310 ه/ 923 م)، من خلال المعرفة التاريخية لفؤاد سزكين، وما نشر عنه في مصنفه الشهير، تاريخ التراث العربي، وبيان المعطيات التي اعتمدها سزكين في توضيح صورة الطبري التاريخية، وكيفية تعامله مع تنسيق المصطلحات التراثية المتعلقة بعصر ابن جرير، وأبرز ما دونه يراعه من كتب، كانت لها صدى بارزا بين أوساط المجتمع الإسلامي في العصر الوسيط ولاسيما مصنفه الأبرز عند المؤرخين (تاريخ الرسل والملوك أو تاريخ الطبري)، وإلى أي مدى أثر الطبري في تطور التدوين التاريخي، وبالتالي تلخيص تلك الصورة السزكينية للطبري بإبراز وجهة نظر صاحب الترجمة عن هذا المؤرخ ومدوناته المكتوبة.
There is no doubt that the linguistic debates are based on the interaction between the two sides of the speech (the addresser and the addressee). These debates have been considered as a dialogue exercise across a pilgrimage path. Thus, they were based on the questions of the grammarian Bashar Al-Andalusi and Al-Zubaidi Muhammad Ibn Al-Hasan Al-Nahawi Abi Bakr, Jalasah Al-Mansur Ibn Muhammad Ibn Abi Amer to Sa'id Ibn Abi Al-Hasan Analytical material upon which the strategies of speech in those debates were adopted. The study overtly presents a procedural work that can be useful in the analysis and dismantling of the corresponding speech far from the hypothetical example brought in the fluorescence of books and studies that dealt with the subject of discourse Analysis. Sa'ad Ibn Al-Hassan's debates were "exam-based debates," based on the accountability of the people of the charge and the prosecution. This was the case in the religious and creed debates the contents of which was leaked to the linguistic debates. It is based on revealing the rhetoric of linguistic addresses, and forced him to admit himself wrong. The debates in this case were not aimed at demonstrating the right and seeking seriousness, but seeking to overthrew the addressee through a question-and-answer approach that contributed to the diversification of its external structure.
|
