| المستخلص: |
لقد حظيت اللغة العربية بثناء القرآن الكريم ومدحه في غير موضع من ذلك قوله تعالى (وَلَقَدْ نَعْلَمُ أَنَّهُمْ يَقُولُونَ إِنَّمَا يُعَلِّمُهُ بَشَرٌ لِسَانُ الَّذِي يُلْحِدُونَ إِلَيْهِ أَعْجَمِيٌّ وَهَذَا لِسَانٌ عَرَبِيٌّ مُبِينٌ) [النحل: 103]، وقوله تعالى: (نَزَلَ بِهِ الرُّوحُ الْأَمِينُ - عَلَى قَلْبِكَ لِتَكُونَ مِنَ الْمُنْذِرِينَ - بِلِسَانٍ عَرَبِيٍّ مُبِينٍ) [الشعراء: 193 - 195]، وقد دفع حب العرب للغتهم إلى أن يبالغوا بالعناية بها ويتجهوا إلى البحث المدقق عن أصولها وخصائصها ويؤلفوا الكتب التي تتوخى صيانتها والإبقاء على نقائها فحظيت بمؤلفات كثيرة في نحوها وصرفها ومتنها، وزاد من حب العرب للغتهم تمجيد القرآن الكريم لها.
Many books have recently been written to correct the general mistakes. In the modern age, there has been a tendency to activate the linguistic correction for which supporters were from different cultures and different references as well. Those has led to to create a variation in both style of research writing and conduction. Although the old linguists had their own interest in reforming language and dealing with mistakes, the modern age linguists were known by many students as well as scientists who had their active contributions in this field, such as the Father Anstas Mary Al-Keremly, Prof. Kamal Ibrahim, Dr. Mustafa Jawad, and. Asa’d Khalil Daghir, Dr. Ibrahim Al-Samaraey, Al Sheikh Ibrahim Al-Yaziji and. Ibrahim Al-Wa’ely and Dr. Nima Raheem Al-Azawy. Critics have been divided into three groups: the first was known with severity in accepting evolution; the second group of modern critics have made their own way of tolerance satisfying the old critics; while the third and smaller group included a small group of scientists who mixed both of the styles: the normative severity in some works and the descriptive lenient direction. The modern linguistic criticism included the mistakes in morphology, syntax, linguistics and spelling; while the phonological linguistic criticism was concerned with replacing of letters or changing the vowel sounds.
|
