ارسل ملاحظاتك

ارسل ملاحظاتك لنا







Resin Bonded Bridges Is it an Option in Libya: Audit Study

المصدر: مجلة الأستاذ
الناشر: جامعة طرابلس - نقابة أعضاء هيئة التدريس
المؤلف الرئيسي: Omer, Khalid A. (Author)
مؤلفين آخرين: Smeda, Fatma (Co-Author)
المجلد/العدد: ع18
محكمة: نعم
الدولة: ليبيا
التاريخ الميلادي: 2020
الشهر: ربيع
الصفحات: 21 - 35
رقم MD: 1247552
نوع المحتوى: بحوث ومقالات
اللغة: الإنجليزية
قواعد المعلومات: EduSearch
مواضيع:
كلمات المؤلف المفتاحية:
Resin Bonded Bridge | Adhesive Bridge | Awareness | Attitude | Dental Practioner | Specialist
رابط المحتوى:
صورة الغلاف QR قانون

عدد مرات التحميل

1

حفظ في:
LEADER 02942nam a2200229 4500
001 1997871
041 |a eng 
044 |b ليبيا 
100 |9 665620  |a Omer, Khalid A.  |e Author 
245 |a Resin Bonded Bridges Is it an Option in Libya:  |b Audit Study 
260 |b جامعة طرابلس - نقابة أعضاء هيئة التدريس  |c 2020  |g ربيع 
300 |a 21 - 35 
336 |a بحوث ومقالات  |b Article 
520 |b Statement of the problem: Resin bonded bridges (RBBs) have been used to restore edentulous spaces for many years and offer many advantages as a conservative approach to tooth replacement over conventional full coverage fixed prosthesis. However, the use of this treatment option has been limited. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the knowledge and attitude of dentists in Libya, including general dental practitioners (GDPs) and prosthodontics and restorative specialists (SPs), toward RBBs. Methods: in this study, questionnaires designed to survey knowledge of RBB performance factors were distributed to GDPs and SPs (n = 200). Specifically, opinions of GDPs and SPs regarding clinical, mechanical, technique and patient-dependent performance factors of RBBs were obtained. Average significance and tests were used to identify the frequency, pattern, and significance of the response variables identified. Results: A majority (78%) of the subjects reported using RBBs in less than 7% of their pros- prosthodontics cases. The most common reason for the limited clinical application of RBBs was observed poor retention (33%). In addition, SPs regarded the influence of enamel structure, number of pontics, cement type, RBB design, and surface treatment as "very significant" factors with respect to RBB survival. Overall, a statistically significant difference was observed between the responses of GDPs and SPs regarding their knowledge of performance factors for RBBs. Conclusion: In the light of this study, the different resin-bonded bridges appear to provide acceptable option for replacing single missing tooth. In comparison to SPs, GDPs reported greater disagreement with current standards for RBB success factors. Moreover, 52% of SPs and 61% of GDPs used RBBs for less than 7% of their prosthodontics cases. Therefore, continuing education opportunities are needed for practicing den-dentists, and undergraduate students need to receive greater exposure to the clinical application of RBBs. 
653 |a التعويضات السنية  |a التقني والأداء  |a طب الأسنان 
692 |b Resin Bonded Bridge  |b Adhesive Bridge  |b Awareness  |b Attitude  |b Dental Practioner  |b Specialist 
700 |9 638109  |a Smeda, Fatma  |e Co-Author 
773 |4 التربية والتعليم  |6 Education & Educational Research  |c 003  |e Al-OstaTh  |l 018  |m ع18  |o 1594  |s مجلة الأستاذ  |v 000 
856 |u 1594-000-018-003.pdf 
930 |d y  |p y  |q n 
995 |a EduSearch 
999 |c 1247552  |d 1247552