ارسل ملاحظاتك

ارسل ملاحظاتك لنا







EU Powerlessness Conflicting Perceptions in Response to the War on Gaza

المصدر: مجلة أكاديمية شمال أوربا المحكمة للدراسات والبحوث
الناشر: أكاديمية شمال أوربا للعلوم والبحث العلمي
المؤلف الرئيسي: Ziadeh, Adeeb (Author)
المجلد/العدد: مج3, ع16
محكمة: نعم
الدولة: الدنمارك
التاريخ الميلادي: 2022
الشهر: يوليو
الصفحات: 105 - 130
ISSN: 2596-7517
رقم MD: 1291016
نوع المحتوى: بحوث ومقالات
اللغة: الإنجليزية
قواعد المعلومات: HumanIndex
مواضيع:
كلمات المؤلف المفتاحية:
Gaza Strip | Hamas | Israeli Occupation | Self-Defense | Right of Resistance | European Parliament | European Union | Apartheid
رابط المحتوى:
صورة الغلاف QR قانون

عدد مرات التحميل

15

حفظ في:
LEADER 02976nam a22002177a 4500
001 2048480
041 |a eng 
044 |b الدنمارك 
100 |9 685575  |a Ziadeh, Adeeb  |e Author 
245 |a EU Powerlessness Conflicting Perceptions in Response to the War on Gaza 
260 |b أكاديمية شمال أوربا للعلوم والبحث العلمي  |c 2022  |g يوليو 
300 |a 105 - 130 
336 |a بحوث ومقالات  |b Article 
520 |b This article aimed to scrutinize the EU’s cause of powerlessness in dealing with the confrontation, which erupted between the Israeli occupation and Gaza strip in May 2021. Due to the fact that the EU was one of the least actionist external big actors which affected the situation on ground during the war politically and diplomatically, this article tried to interpret this deficiency, as researchers have not tackled it so far. However, in serving this, forty-one EU parliamentary members’ speeches (MEPs) have been critically and thoroughly analyzed. Using content analysis, alongside other tools extracted from the realist perspective combined with one of the constructivist theoretical angles, significantly enabled the researcher in analyzing the European politicians’ discourses in this regard. It is significantly found that the revisiting EU failure in adequately tackling such an event is attributed to the biased convictions and subjective perceptions that most of the EU politicians hold about the Israeli-Palestinian cause. Conflictual diagnostic perceptions of the MEPs with regard to the exploded situation expressively shown the extent to which divisions amongst politicians have left the EU’s diplomacy miserably paralyzed; a matter that confirmed the realists’ perspective about the EU foreign policy as it is “nothing more than the combined effort of the member states’ foreign policies”. Undoubtedly, having unanimity, as a mechanism for foreign policy decision-making, contributed to putting extra burdens on the EU politicians, particularly in the dossier under investigation. Hence, light was shed on MEPs’ perspectives regarding the roots of the confrontation, justice against peace, self-defense versus right of resistance and demonization of Hamas contrasted with humanitirization of Israel. 
653 |a الحرب على غزة  |a حق المقاومة  |a الاحتلال الصهيوني  |a الاتحاد الأوروبي 
692 |b Gaza Strip  |b Hamas  |b Israeli Occupation  |b Self-Defense  |b Right of Resistance  |b European Parliament  |b European Union  |b Apartheid 
773 |4 العلوم الإنسانية ، متعددة التخصصات  |6 Humanities, Multidisciplinary  |c 006  |e Journal of Northern Europe Academy Court for Studies & Research  |l 016  |m مج3, ع16  |o 1944  |s مجلة أكاديمية شمال أوربا المحكمة للدراسات والبحوث  |v 003  |x 2596-7517 
856 |u 1944-003-016-006.pdf 
930 |d y  |p y  |q n 
995 |a HumanIndex 
999 |c 1291016  |d 1291016 

عناصر مشابهة