ارسل ملاحظاتك

ارسل ملاحظاتك لنا







A Comparative Study on Intensifiers in Opinion Articles on Rudaw Portal

المصدر: مجلة جامعة كويه للعلوم الإنسانية والاجتماعية
الناشر: جامعة كويه
المؤلف الرئيسي: Khorsheed, Nahlah N. (Author)
مؤلفين آخرين: Dzakiria, Hisham (Co-Author), Singh, Manvender Kaur Sarjit (Co-Author)
المجلد/العدد: مج5, ع1
محكمة: نعم
الدولة: العراق
التاريخ الميلادي: 2022
الصفحات: 70 - 76
ISSN: 2522-3259
رقم MD: 1302507
نوع المحتوى: بحوث ومقالات
اللغة: الإنجليزية
قواعد المعلومات: EduSearch, HumanIndex
مواضيع:
كلمات المؤلف المفتاحية:
Kurdish Authors | Non-Kurdish Authors | Rudaw Opinion Articles | Usas | Wmatrix
رابط المحتوى:
صورة الغلاف QR قانون
حفظ في:
المستخلص: Semantically, intensifiers are concerned with the degree that scales the element to which the intensifiers applied to a point either higher than the norm or lower. Thus, the writers’ involvement with or detachment from a statement can be reflected through the use of intensifiers. This paper explores the use of intensifiers by Kurdish authors in comparison to non-Kurdish authors who write opinion articles on Rudaw portal. The aim of the study is to demonstrate how these two groups of authors differ in their preference for the use of intensifiers. To this end, two corpora were compiled: Kurdish authors (COKA) and non-Kurdish authors (CONKA). The online interface of UCREL Semantic Analysis System (USAS) in Wmatrix was employed to identify the semantic categories of intensifiers. The results showed that boosters had the highest frequency (140 in COKA and 280 in CONKA). However, the use of all categories was higher by the non-Kurdish authors and with wider range of lexicons than the Kurdish authors. This study contributes to literature of the use of automated semantic tagger (USAS) for identifying intensifiers; it is a mechanism that can be fruitful for investigating other lexico grammatical items for a better understanding of the link between language and socio-cultural factors.

ISSN: 2522-3259

عناصر مشابهة