المستخلص: |
The substantive developments that handling the exceptional and unfamiliar provisions of the administrative contract in equivalent with the recent trends aimed at strengthening the powers of the public administration in both financially and legally in order to help and enable it to overcome the outgoing challenges that it dictated in the public aspect. all this affected the traditional legal adjustment of the administrative contract, making it an attractive pattern in terms of appearance but “impersonated” almost all of the characteristics of the adhesion contracts, which contributed in stripping the contractor from a large limits of the same agreement system in the contract, and even the reform solutions initiated by the administrative judiciary, whether in France or some Arab countries, in order to protect the contractor’s financial rights in particular. it did not provide a comprehensive solution to the same initial problem due to the administration’s entitlement and acquisition of the direct methods of implementation of the measures related to the process of its contracts, which formed a general belief and construed of the phrase denoted that “the administrative judge protects individuals from the arbitrariness of the administration” which has gradually lost its original accuracy and weakened and regressed to become mere ruins.
|