| 520 |
|
|
|a يتناول البحث نقد التفسير عند السعدي، ويهدف إلى تحديد مجالات نقد التفسير عنده، والتعرف على الأسس التي انطلق منها في منهجه النقدي، وإبراز ميزات نقده للتفسير وما يتعلق به، وقد استخدمت فيه منهج البحث الوصفي القائم على الاستقراء والتحليل، ومن أهم نتائج البحث ما يلي: 1 - نقد التفسير عند السعدي تفاوت في نتاجه العلمي ومؤلفاته في الدراسات القرآنية، وتركز في تيسير الكريم الرحمن في تفسير كلام المنان، بينما خلت بعض مؤلفاته من نقد التفسير بكافة مجالاته مثل: القواعد الحسان لتفسير القرآن، وفتح الرحيم الملك العلام في علم العقائد والتوحيد والأخلاق والأحكام المستنبطة من القرآن، والدلائل القرآنية في أن العلوم النافعة العصرية داخلة في الدين الإسلامي. 2- العمق النقدي عند السعدي كان مبنيا على أسس متينة من القرآن الكريم والسنة النبوية والإجماع واللغة العربية والواقع، وقد تنوع أسلوب السعدي في توظيف أدواته ومقاييسه النقدية بحسب نوع الأساس والمستند الذي يعتمد عليه. 3- يعد نقد الأقوال التفسيرية من أبرز مجالات نقد التفسير عند السعدي وأهمها، إذ اتخذ أسلوبين أحدهما صريحا، والآخر غير صريح، ولكل من الأسلوبين صور مختلفة. 4- امتاز نقد التفسير عند السعدي بميزات متعددة، بعضها يعود لمؤهلاته الشخصية، وبعضها يرجع لمهارته في العلوم الإسلامية وتطبيق أدوات الصناعة النقدية.
|b Research title: Al Sa'di's Approach to Exegesis Criticism. Topic: This research deals with Al Sa'di's approach to exegesis criticism. It aims to identify the areas of exegesis criticism according to Al Sa'di. It also seeks to know the bases from which he proceeded in his critical approach, and to highlight the features of his criticism of exegesis and all that is related to it. The researcher used the descriptive research method based on induction and analysis. The most important findings are the following: 1. Al Sa'di's approach to exegesis criticism varied as per his scientific achievement and his writings represented in Quranic studies, particularly Tafsir al-Sa'di. Interestingly, some of his books were devoid of criticism of exegesis. These include: The Good Rules for the Interpretation of the Qur’an, and Fath ar-Rahim al-Malik al-'Allam (The guidance of the Most Merciful, the All-Knowing King, in the science of beliefs, monotheism, morals, and rulings derived from the Qur’an), and the Qur’anic evidence that modern useful sciences are included in the Islamic religion. 2. The critical depth that characterizes the approach of al-Sa'di, as it was based on solid foundations from the Holy Qur’an, the Prophet’s Sunnah, consensus, the Arabic language, and reality. Al-Saadi's method of employing his critical tools and measures varied according to the type of basis and the document on which he relied. 3. Criticism of exegetical sayings is one of the most important areas of criticism of exegesis in the approach of l-Sa'di, as he adopted two methods, one is explicit, and the other is implicit, and each of the two methods has different forms. 4. The approach to criticism of exegesis adopted by al-Sa'di was characterized by several features, some of which were influenced by his personal qualifications, and some were due to his skill in Islamic sciences and the application of criticism tools. 5. The research included the following recommendations: 1- Inviting specialists in Qur’anic studies to look deeply into the approaches of the interpreters and to know their areas of interest, as this casts a shadow over the aspects of criticism of these circles, which contributes to the revision of exegesis and its sciences, and to editing its issues, and purifying them from error, anomaly and deviation. 2- Increasing interest in studying scientific criticism approach, principles, and rules, and developing critical talents specialized in Islamic sciences, and providing them with the knowledge, skills, and values necessary for criticism making.
|
