520 |
|
|
|a كتبت هذا البحث من جملة التعقبات على الكاتب جورج طرابيشي- في كتابه "من إسلام القرآن إلى إسلام الحديث"، في الفصل المتعلق بـ "انتصار أهل الحديث"؛ صيانة لعلم الجرح والتعديل، ورجال السنة النبوية المشرفة، والذود عن ساحتهم المطهرة؛ فقد دون الكاتب عدة مغالطات فيما يختص بفن رواية الحديث، وعلم الجرح والتعديل- علم الرجال، فذكر أن معيار التوثيق أو التعديل والجرح ذاتي محض، وزعم بأن الإمام أحمد لم يتردد في أن يقلب معايير الصحة في الحديث، وكلامه في رواة مسند الإمام أحمد، و(عبدالله) ابن الإمام أحمد، واتهامه للقطيعي بالوضع والكذب. ففندت هذه المغالطات، وتعقبتها ببيان الصواب من منهج رجال أهل الحديث- رحمهم الله- تعالى.
|b (Hadith Comments on the Book of Tarabishi), in his book "From the Islam of the Qur'an to the Islam of Hadith", in the chapter related to "The Victory of the People of Hadith", this Comments for the most prominent matters related to the science of dobut and modification- the art of hadith narration -. I wrote this research among the comments on the writer George Tarabishi- in his book "From the Islam of the Qur'an to the Islam of Hadith", in the chapter related to "The Victory of the People of Hadith" -, in order to preserve the science of doubt arising and modification, and the men of the honorable Sunnah of the Prophet, and defending their purified arena. The writer wrote several inaccuracies regarding the art of hadith narration, and the science of doubt and modification,- the science of men- so he mentioned that the criterion of documentation or modification and doubt is purely subjective, and he say’s the science of men is one of the most false sciences, and he claimed that Imam Ahmed did not hesitate to overturn the standards of validity in the hadith, and his words are in the narrators of the Musnad of Imam Ahmed, And (Abdullah) the son of Imam Ahmad, and his accusation of al-Qati’i of fabrication and lying. So I refuted these fallacies and followed them up with a statement of correctness from the methodology of Ahl al-Hadith, may God Almighty have mercy on them.
|