العنوان بلغة أخرى: |
Determining Areas of Conflict in Controversial Issues According to Jurists: An Analogous Research on the Similarities between Principles of Islamic Law and Jurisprudential Argumentation |
---|---|
المصدر: | مجلة دار الإفتاء المصرية |
الناشر: | دار الافتاء المصرية |
المؤلف الرئيسي: | يونس، أحمد عبدالمرضي علي (مؤلف) |
المؤلف الرئيسي (الإنجليزية): | Younis, Ahmad Abdul-Murdi Ali |
المجلد/العدد: | ع51 |
محكمة: | نعم |
الدولة: |
مصر |
التاريخ الميلادي: |
2022
|
التاريخ الهجري: | 1444 |
الشهر: | أكتوبر |
الصفحات: | 148 - 241 |
رقم MD: | 1406186 |
نوع المحتوى: | بحوث ومقالات |
اللغة: | العربية |
قواعد المعلومات: | IslamicInfo |
مواضيع: | |
رابط المحتوى: |
المستخلص: |
This research paper clarifies the concept “Determination of the areas of conflict in controversial issues” and applying them on jurisprudential controversial issues in the Principles of Islamic Law. - The research comes up with a group of results, the most important among them is mentioning the chosen opinion in identifying “Determining the areas of conflict in controversial issues” which is to sort out the issues over which there is a scholarly contention from others of unanimous agreement among the scholars that have things in common. - This paper provides a safe haven both from juristic disagreeing over issues of scholarly unanimous agreement and using juristic evidences in other than areas of scholarly contention. - This research is concluded with developing a group of legal classifications for determining the areas of conflict in a manner that guarantees the validity of the procedures applied for these areas. Furthermore, this paper accommodates the jurisprudential disagreement and activates evidences and legal contexts in controlling controversial issues. |
---|