ارسل ملاحظاتك

ارسل ملاحظاتك لنا









Shock Vs. Neurogenic and Spinal Reflexes, New Classification and SST and SOCATRA CRITERIA for Diagnosis and Prognosis

المصدر: مجلة قراءات علمية في الأبحاث والدراسات القانونية والاقتصادية والعلوم الإنسانية والشرعية
الناشر: حليمة عبدالرمي
المؤلف الرئيسي: Alalsharabe, Akram Kaid (Author)
المجلد/العدد: ع31
محكمة: نعم
الدولة: المغرب
التاريخ الميلادي: 2024
الشهر: مايو
الصفحات: 895 - 909
ISSN: 2737-8322
رقم MD: 1475818
نوع المحتوى: بحوث ومقالات
اللغة: الإنجليزية
قواعد المعلومات: EcoLink, IslamicInfo, AraBase, HumanIndex
مواضيع:
رابط المحتوى:
صورة الغلاف QR قانون

عدد مرات التحميل

1

حفظ في:
LEADER 02829nam a22002417a 4500
001 2219520
041 |a eng 
044 |b المغرب 
100 |a Alalsharabe, Akram Kaid   |e Author  |9 782662 
245 |a Shock Vs. Neurogenic and Spinal Reflexes, New Classification and SST and SOCATRA CRITERIA for Diagnosis and Prognosis 
260 |b حليمة عبدالرمي  |c 2024  |g مايو 
300 |a 895 - 909 
336 |a بحوث ومقالات  |b Article 
520 |b Shock is abroad medical term that undergone for many decades to research and study and no medical book forgets shock from physiology books to medical and surgical books. Most extensive studies concerning about classification and management of shock and also criteria for diagnosis shock, despite these there is dissociation between classification and criteria and management. As we know and studied we have four types of shock according to Blalock's 1934 description Cardiogenic, hematogenic, Vasogenic and Neurogenic. And other classifications also insert Neurogenic reflex as a shock and take anaphylactic shock out. These classifications make confusion in management of septic and anaphylactic shock and give more importance for Neurogenic shock that not meet any criteria of shock So I discuss the criteria and classification, pathophysiology, management of shock and proof that Neurogenic reflex is not a shock and provide new classification and Shock Specific Therapy (SST). Also most important things in this study are The NEW CRITERIA FOR DIAGNOSIS AND PROGNOSIS PURPOSES. I CALL IT AS (SOCATRA CRITERIA). METHOD Depending on base evidence study and cases follow up and management for 355 cases in 4 Yemeni hospitals that diagnosed as shock of different types. After documentation and follow up the cases divided to the following: 1. Cardiogenic shock 52 cases 2. Hemorrhagic shock 144 cases 3. Anaphylactic shock 37 cases 4. Neurogenic shock and spinal shock 49 cases 5. Septic shock 61 cases 6. Mixed shock 22 cases About 50 cases was expired and 14 case discharged with neurological sequels. 
653 |a الفيزيولوجيا المرضية  |a إدارة الصدمات  |a الصدمات القلبية  |a الصدمات العصبية  |a الصدمات الشوكي 
773 |4 العلوم الإنسانية ، متعددة التخصصات  |6 Humanities, Multidisciplinary  |c 054  |l 031  |m ع31  |o 2617  |s مجلة قراءات علمية في الأبحاث والدراسات القانونية والاقتصادية والعلوم الإنسانية والشرعية  |v 000  |f Maǧallaẗ qirāʾāt ʿilmiyaẗ fī al-abḥāṯ wa al-ddirāsāt al-qānūniyẗ wa al-idāriya  |x 2737-8322 
856 |u 2617-000-031-054.pdf 
930 |d y  |p y  |q n 
995 |a EcoLink 
995 |a IslamicInfo 
995 |a AraBase 
995 |a HumanIndex 
999 |c 1475818  |d 1475818