تم إضافة تقرير جديد 2024
ارسل ملاحظاتك

ارسل ملاحظاتك لنا









الرئيسية > The Evolution of Humanitarian...>الوصف

The Evolution of Humanitarian Intervention: Ethical and Pragmatic Considerations in International Law - from the Responsibility to Protect to the Responsibility While Protecting

المصدر: مجلة القانون والمجتمع والسلطة
الناشر: جامعة وهران2 محمد بن أحمد - كلية الحقوق - مخبر القانون والمجتمع والسلطة
المؤلف الرئيسي: Gouasmia, Siham (Author)
المجلد/العدد: مج13, ع2
محكمة: نعم
الدولة: الجزائر
التاريخ الميلادي: 2024
الشهر: سبتمبر
الصفحات: 57 - 80
ISSN: 2253-0266
رقم MD: 1521477
نوع المحتوى: بحوث ومقالات
اللغة: الإنجليزية
قواعد المعلومات: IslamicInfo
مواضيع:
الحماية القانونية | القانون الدولي | حقوق الإنسان | البرازيل
كلمات المؤلف المفتاحية:
Responsibility to Protect | Responsibility While Protecting | Humanitarian Intervention | International Law | Brazil
رابط المحتوى:

الناشر لهذه المادة لم يسمح بإتاحتها.
صورة الغلاف QR قانون
حفظ في:
المستخلص: The Responsibility to Protect (R2P) is a dynamic and evolving concept within the field of humanitarian intervention. Initially introduced as a response to the global need for protecting populations from mass atrocities, it represents an attempt to create a novel framework within international law. R2P is centered on the idea that sovereignty is not an absolute right but carries the responsibility to protect citizens from genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity. Despite its widespread endorsement, there is ongoing debate regarding the future trajectory and practical application of R2P. The discourse oscillates between whether R2P should be seen as a shared understanding of moral principles or as a legally binding doctrine within international law. Its evolution is shaped by the complex interactions among states, international organizations, and civil society, each promoting varying interpretations of the concept. A significant development occurred in 2011 with Brazil's introduction of the concept of Responsibility while Protecting (RwP), which sought to refine and complement R2P by emphasizing the importance of accountability and oversight during interventions. RwP introduced the idea that while states have the responsibility to intervene in situations of mass atrocities, they must do so in a manner that adheres to strict criteria, including proportionality and monitoring the consequences of their actions. This addition has sparked further debate about the strength and limitations of R2P, with some arguing that RwP could dilute the urgency of intervention, while others view it as a necessary safeguard against abuse. The ongoing dialogue between these two concepts reflects the broader tension between ethical and pragmatic considerations in international humanitarian law, leaving the future of both frameworks open to interpretation and reform.
ISSN: 2253-0266

عناصر مشابهة


© 2025 المنظومة. جميع الحقوق محفوظة.