المستخلص: |
This study compares the Islamic legal ruling on camel urine and its medicinal applications according to Imam Abu Hanifa with that of other juristic schools. Imam Abu Hanifa asserts that camel urine is considered impure, rendering its consumption or medicinal use impermissible. This position is substantiated by overarching principles derived from the prophetic Sunnah, wherein the Prophet Muhammad ruled against the consumption of urine in general, without differentiating between various types. This view is further endorsed by Imam Al-Shafi’i. In contrast, the Malikis, Hanbalis, and Muhammad Ibn al-Hasan argued in support of the purity of camel urine and its permissibility for medicinal use. They substantiated their opinion with the Hadith of the 'Araniyyin, wherein the Prophet Muhammad granted permission for the consumption of camel urine. The Hanafis argued that this Hadith had been abrogated by the overarching principles found in the Sunnah, which categorically state that all urine is impure. They emphasized that the Hadith addressed a particular situation in which the Prophet permitted this exception solely for an urgent need, applicable only to certain individuals at a specific time, and should not be extrapolated beyond that context.
|