ارسل ملاحظاتك

ارسل ملاحظاتك لنا









مذهب الإمام أبي حنيفة في بول الإبل والتداوي به: دراسة فقهية مقارنة

العنوان بلغة أخرى: Imam Abu Hanifa's Opinion on Camel Urine and its Medicinal Use: A Comparative Jurisprudential Study
المصدر: مجلة دار الإفتاء المصرية
الناشر: دار الافتاء المصرية
المؤلف الرئيسي: سلام، هاني سيد تمام (مؤلف)
المؤلف الرئيسي (الإنجليزية): Salam, Hani Sayed Tammam
المجلد/العدد: ع59
محكمة: نعم
الدولة: مصر
التاريخ الميلادي: 2024
التاريخ الهجري: 1446
الشهر: أكتوبر
الصفحات: 122 - 181
ISSN: 2636-4417
رقم MD: 1527008
نوع المحتوى: بحوث ومقالات
اللغة: العربية
قواعد المعلومات: IslamicInfo
مواضيع:
رابط المحتوى:
صورة الغلاف QR قانون

عدد مرات التحميل

2

حفظ في:
المستخلص: This study compares the Islamic legal ruling on camel urine and its medicinal applications according to Imam Abu Hanifa with that of other juristic schools. Imam Abu Hanifa asserts that camel urine is considered impure, rendering its consumption or medicinal use impermissible. This position is substantiated by overarching principles derived from the prophetic Sunnah, wherein the Prophet Muhammad ruled against the consumption of urine in general, without differentiating between various types. This view is further endorsed by Imam Al-Shafi’i. In contrast, the Malikis, Hanbalis, and Muhammad Ibn al-Hasan argued in support of the purity of camel urine and its permissibility for medicinal use. They substantiated their opinion with the Hadith of the 'Araniyyin, wherein the Prophet Muhammad granted permission for the consumption of camel urine. The Hanafis argued that this Hadith had been abrogated by the overarching principles found in the Sunnah, which categorically state that all urine is impure. They emphasized that the Hadith addressed a particular situation in which the Prophet permitted this exception solely for an urgent need, applicable only to certain individuals at a specific time, and should not be extrapolated beyond that context.

ISSN: 2636-4417