ارسل ملاحظاتك

ارسل ملاحظاتك لنا







أبعاد التماسك الاجتماعي و مظاهره في جماعات العمل : دراسة ميدانية عاملية في معمل الغزل و النسيج / الموصل

المصدر: آداب الرافدين
الناشر: جامعة الموصل - كلية الآداب
المؤلف الرئيسي: النجار، صباح أحمد محمد (مؤلف)
المؤلف الرئيسي (الإنجليزية): Najar, Sabah Ahmad Muhammad
المجلد/العدد: ع 40
محكمة: نعم
الدولة: العراق
التاريخ الميلادي: 2005
التاريخ الهجري: 1426
الصفحات: 1 - 26
ISSN: 0378-2867
رقم MD: 161411
نوع المحتوى: بحوث ومقالات
قواعد المعلومات: AraBase
مواضيع:
رابط المحتوى:
صورة الغلاف QR قانون

عدد مرات التحميل

85

حفظ في:
المستخلص: Small groups make the roles of their individuals depend greatly upon each other, a question which can be raised of whether interaction or coherence can be seen within one or multi dimensions, and the possibility of determining those dimensions. The research aims at determining the levels of social coherence of working groups through a number of changes. A working group is a social unit of 2-10 individuals related socially face with each other. The believe in certain values,and standards which support the group’s purposes. To achieve has the goal of this research, the research has adopted the sample method of the social survey approach using a certain measurement of coherence among workings. The results of field research has shown the following: 1. A middle amount of coherence is found among the group under study. 2. Workers having long-term experience shown more response for coherence. 3. Males show more response to social coherence with their groups than females do. 4. Those having intermediate certificate show more response than primary ones. 5.The study indicates states of love and intimacy helping other during work as well as solving problems which create a state of harmony among a group. 5. Face to face interaction (direct) enhances the coherence among working groups. So the smaller the group the greater the coherence. 6. Relationship between both sex within working fields is weak. 7. An important degree of loyalty to a group is found 8. 9.Individuals adhere to the group criteria. 10. Informal organization effects production limitation. 11. A group represents a social pressure device on its members.

ISSN: 0378-2867