| المستخلص: |
Many modern linguists committed a mistake in the in their description of the votes in their studies, which settled upon the ancient Arab heritage and the efforts of scientists; some of their analysis came lacking the scientific basis required for voice lesson; because they did not discuss the laws that govern the full audio sound character, forgetting the question of context, voice; sound and meaning Although the meaning of their men independent books on the subject; that they wanted from the face of the ancient faulted; It is another victory for them; and taken things from the ancients did not say Sibawayh (for example) to describe the phenomenon. I see the reason for this problem is that the ancients did not distinguish between the literary language and the common daily language and dialects; When they described the sounds; although they gave good attention to the phenomena of language in general and particularly in the sounds attributed to the dialects of the tribes, or the Arab countries. While we find that most of the modernists are trying to differentiate between the classical language with linguistic characteristics of the tribes; the city language, in the opinion of Dr. Anis Ibrahim is more careful in the pronunciation. while the people of the desert were irritable performance; When they have quoted the ancient audio features not suggested by one of them; as attributed the two versions (fa'el) and (fe'eel) to urban, who give the right to speech sounds despite the effort involved in the pronunciation. The harmony between the movements in these meters results in (is derived) and (verb) it is a characteristic of the Bedouin dialects as they are making the sound center of glottal; while not narrated Sibawayh ( ) this phenomenon as described by d. Anis Ibrahim, but said the words turned into the slot to dhama, which believes that Dhama and Kasra came in to highlight the name of the place of the name given to the subject of the act. This is an example of not reading the ancient heritage in the description of acoustic phenomena led to read a real problem in the description of Arab voices, we stand in this research to try statement has been affected by some representatives of Western studies in phonetics, and the narrators say that the views of the ancient words of the assumptions and impressions of the phenomena of sound did not traveling the Arabs do not differ from their article about the characteristics of some voices are assumptions and impressions of the reading of the efforts of scientists predecessors in this area. Hayeem Rabin has admitted that Haim analysis of the phenomena voice was impressionism and did not take into account many of the problems related to this phenomenon ( ). The language sound are generally divided by linguistics into Consonants and Vowels; This division is based on two grounds: as a silent voice ((voice of words, follow the bridge or obstruction of the air vent device in a speech the highest oboe)) ( ) This explains the is basically organic, The foundation is the proportion of voice clarity and sound in the hearing scientists noticed that consonants are more pronounced in the hearing of vowels, and voiced sounds are stronger and clearer in the hearing of the voiceless sounds and the voices on this Arab is divided on: 1. Soait: The number six, three short This is known as movements (opening and Kasra and Vibrio), three of them for what is known as the voices of the tide (one thousand and waw and Omega), known as illness or soft voices or sounds wild ( ). 2. Soamt: there are over twenty-eight: the votes are called static or Asahah () or the letters or sounds locked ( ). Voiced and Voiceless: The sound can be divided to Voced and Voiceless and the essence of this dividion is the vibration of the vocal cords in the larynx () and therefore defined the sound (Voiced) that ((the sound of the vocal cords vibrate if delivered)) ( ) and knows the sound (voiceless) that ((the sound does not vibrate the vocal cords if delivered)). This classification is the center of this study. \
|
