ارسل ملاحظاتك

ارسل ملاحظاتك لنا







تراجع غولدستون عن تقريره خطوة الى الوراء في غير مكانها

المصدر: مجلة دراسات شرق أوسطية
الناشر: مركز دراسات الشرق الاوسط
المؤلف الرئيسي: الموسى، محمد (مؤلف)
المجلد/العدد: مج 15, ع 56
محكمة: نعم
الدولة: الأردن
التاريخ الميلادي: 2011
الصفحات: 55 - 69
ISSN: 1811-8208
رقم MD: 202976
نوع المحتوى: بحوث ومقالات
قواعد المعلومات: EcoLink, HumanIndex
مواضيع:
رابط المحتوى:
صورة الغلاف QR قانون

عدد مرات التحميل

4

حفظ في:
المستخلص: On April 4,2011 Magistrate Richard Goldstone, former Judge at South Africa’s Constitutional Tribunal and Head of the UN Gaza Fact Finding Commission, published an article in the Washington Post entitled, Reconsidering the Goldstone Report on Israel and War Crimes. It sparked much controversy in the Arab World and upset many international law specialists. It is argued that the commentary, published in the wake of the Human Rights Council resolution, raises a number of issues questioning the credibility of his own report by attempting to conceal some facts. The article focused on two main points. Firstly, Israel did not, as a general policy, deliberately target Palestinian civilians. Secondly, Hamas must be accountable for its war crimes. A number of issues in the commentary need to be investigated to determine if the original report, as well as the current status and stable rulings of international law, show that the commentary may be accounted as evidence of the incredibility of the original report from which only a limited number of questions are discussed.

ISSN: 1811-8208

عناصر مشابهة