المستخلص: |
When the Arab violent uprisings succeeded each other in Tunisia, Egypt, Libya, Yemen and then Syria, they mainly aimed – regardless of their mottos– to bring down the dictatorships which ruled them for ages. In different ways, they managed to topple four of them and began “transitional” stages. These were supposed to witness special arrangements to establish the new system on various foundations to achieve the targets of the revolutions in “better republics”. In some cases, this stage was just a ‘trick’. It seems so difficult to get out of it in the right time from the revolution to the ‘state’ where a ‘civil’ political democratic system and without extra suffering. A great undisciplined overlap on various levels is taking place between the old guard and the new elements, or between the civil and religious revolutionists. Transitional authorities, whether civil or military, are confused because of political, economic and security problems pressing everybody and influencing state structures. The present analysis looks into the transitional stages within a theoretical political framework, trying to determine their challenges in the Arab uprisings states, such as instability and stage management. Recommendations are made to carry on political reform in those states and, thus, overcome the crisis and achieve stability. The revolutions must set specific goals on which the people’s will is intellectually based.
|