ارسل ملاحظاتك

ارسل ملاحظاتك لنا







الرئيسية > المباحث الأصولية عند ابن رجب ا...>الوصف

المباحث الأصولية عند ابن رجب الحنبلي في كتابه فتح الباري شرح صحيح البخاري وتطبيقاتها الفقهية

العنوان بلغة أخرى: Researches of Origins of Imam Ibn Rajab Al-Hanbeli In His Book Fat'h Al-Bari Explanation of Sahih Al-Bukhari and their jurisprudence applications
المؤلف الرئيسي: المشهداني، جسام محمد عبدالله أحمد (مؤلف)
مؤلفين آخرين: الجبوري، هاشم فارس عبدون (مشرف)
التاريخ الميلادي: 2007
موقع: تكريت
التاريخ الهجري: 1428
الصفحات: 1 - 248
رقم MD: 597226
نوع المحتوى: رسائل جامعية
اللغة: العربية
الدرجة العلمية: رسالة ماجستير
الجامعة: جامعة تكريت
الكلية: كلية التربية
الدولة: العراق
قواعد المعلومات: Dissertations
مواضيع:
علوم القرآن | ابن رجب، عبد الرحمن بن أحمد بن رجب، 795 هـ | كتاب فتح الباري شرح صحيح البخاري
رابط المحتوى:
صفحة العنوان     
المستخلص     
قائمة المحتويات     
24 صفحة الأولى     

الناشر لهذه المادة لم يسمح بإتاحتها.
صورة الغلاف QR قانون
حفظ في:
المستخلص: After this scientific Journey with Imam and memorizer Ibn Rajab Al-Hanbeli – Allah's mercy upon to him – we can come to the following deductions: 1. He is an accurate statement scientist, the reader may say: "all scientists are accurate", my reply to that is: No, for if it is so, they would not check after each other, neither they object to each other, particularly in laying definitions and terms; look, if you like, into their disagreeing in the definition of measurement in this thesis to find the credit of my saying. The more ambiguous the defined, the more disagreeing they are about it. Ibn Rajab did not accept for himself to be else than one of the investigators. For example, he did not take the text, in the question of duty, as an obligatory order, as in the school of Ibn Hazm, following the aspect of the word, but he decides that the word of duty is an aspect in obligation and not a text in it. And the contexture is the evidence to the real intention of the order, and not the mere term. 2. He did not spend a lot in the questions of origins. He did not have an independent book in origins. That is an evidence that he followed the way of the preceding scientists of this sacred nation, whose determination was directed to aims and intentions more than to means. 3. He was Hanbeli in arising but he was independent in selecting answers for questions; the Hanbeli scientists do not differentiate between the cases of prevention weather it is directed to the prevented itself or to its connected description or to its disconnected description, while he sees that preventing the action does not invalidate it unless it is related to it, as purification is related to prayer. The scientists of his school regard the concept of number an argument, and it is an indicant to removal of sentence of other concepts, but he did not regard it so. 4. It is difficult for the looker in the Ibn Rajab's books to classify him as a specialist in a branch of science because his share of all branches was abundant, but I am about to decide that he is one of Hadith scientists for two reasons: a. His work in Fath Al-Bari, as narration and knowledge.

b. His origin overbalancing that he agrees in with the scientists of Hadith not the scientists of Jurisprudence and origins, as in the agreeing with them that the saying of the Companion "we were ordered or we were prevented is in the regard of traceable to the prophet that he disagreed with Al-Hanafiyyah, Al-Dhahiriyah and some Shafi'ia. 5. He adopts the school of the Companions in overbalancing questions including the questions of origins. 6. There are questions of origins that no jurisprudence is based on them; like the question of warranty, is it a commission or not. He did not pay attention to such questions. That was reflected in his juristic school. So if you want to know his judgment in a question of origins, you have to find it within his juristic judgment. 7. If he has no judgment in the question of origin, he only mentions the sayings of the scientists in it. That is like the way of Imam Ahmed. 8. He does not follow the school of Al-Mutakallimin in the attributes, but follows the ancestry school. 9. His measure in overbalancing questions is the clue evidence from Quran and Sunnah . 10. It is necessary to refer to the effect of Theology on the Science of Origins of Jurisprudence and to some of the reasons of disagreement in it is the theological disagreement between its scientists. These are the most important results I could extract from my humble research of Ibn Rajab's researches in origins. I hope I have succeeded in reviewing them. Praise be to Allah, Lord of all creation and peace be upon to Mohammed, members of his family and his companions.

عناصر مشابهة


© 2024 المنظومة. جميع الحقوق محفوظة.