ارسل ملاحظاتك

ارسل ملاحظاتك لنا







الرئيسية > القياس بين الأصوليين والنحويين...>الوصف

القياس بين الأصوليين والنحويين

المؤلف الرئيسي: عيسى، عثمان إبراهيم (مؤلف)
مؤلفين آخرين: الحمد، غانم قدوري (مشرف)
التاريخ الميلادي: 2009
موقع: تكريت
التاريخ الهجري: 1431
الصفحات: 1 - 244
رقم MD: 613248
نوع المحتوى: رسائل جامعية
اللغة: العربية
الدرجة العلمية: رسالة ماجستير
الجامعة: جامعة تكريت
الكلية: كلية التربية
الدولة: العراق
قواعد المعلومات: Dissertations
مواضيع:
النحو العربي
النحو والصرف
النحويين
الأصوليين
رابط المحتوى:
صفحة العنوان     
المستخلص     
24 صفحة الأولى     

الناشر لهذه المادة لم يسمح بإتاحتها.
صورة الغلاف QR قانون
حفظ في:
المستخلص: Analogy in Arabic represents one of the origins of philology in addition to its being an origin of grammar .it is also regarded as the fourth origin of philology by the philologists after he Holy Quran, the prophet's sayings collections, and the philologists sayings. It is also regarded as the second origin of grammar after the Universal, so it is regarded as an important pillar by the philologists and the grammarians ,it is where this subject extracts it's importance. He researcher deals with this subject as follows: An Introduction, An introductory chapter, and three other chapters In chapter one, the researcher deals with the grammatical Analogy definition ,Its prominence, its development, its evidences by the philologists and the grammarians. This Chapter had also been divided into four sections: Section one deals with the Arabic Analogy definition. Section two deals with the Arabic Analogy prominence. Section three deals with the Arabic Analogy development, and section four deals with the Analogy evidences. On chapter two, the researcher deals with the pillars and conditions of Analogy between philologists and the grammarians. It had been divided into two sections. Section one deals with the Analogy pillars. Section two deals with the Analogy conditions. Section one has been divided into five subsections. The first one deals with pillars' linguistic and idiomatic definition. The second one deals with the origin. The third one deals with the branch. The fourth one deals with the reason or the similarity that Analogy depends on. The fifth one deals with the sentence.

The researcher divides the second section into two demands. The first demand deals with the conditions of Analogy by the philologists while the second one deals with the Analogy conditions by the grammarians. On chapter three, the researcher deals with the types of Analogy between the philologists and the grammarians. The researcher has also divided it into two sections. Section one deals with the types of Analogy by the phililogy scientists. Section two deals with the types of Analogy by the grammarians. At the end, the researcher had finished the research with a conclusion, and the most important results the researcher has come up with through this research. Some of these results are: 1-The philologists are earlier in publishing than the grammarians. 2-the philologists classified the Analogy to be at the fourth degree concerning the strength of the grammatical discussion (AlIhtigag) while the grammarians classified it to be at the second degree. 3-both the philologists and the grammarians agree that the Analogy can not be in objection with the text.

عناصر مشابهة


© 2024 المنظومة. جميع الحقوق محفوظة.