المستخلص: |
It is hereby that we can conclude to the facts that led the politicians of the Islamic movements to concentrate on the oriented political activities is to come to power, which is considered as a pass way to achieve the Islamic state and a means to retain the Islamic caliphate, it is also attributed to the nature of the regimes and their attitude of dealing with the international situation. Although, these movements have their own justification to shift from the educational reformation method and focus on the regular oriented works, especially with the multiplicity of the reformation tools and their gradation in the Islamic vision, where it begins with the individual responsibility until it come to the (call) Dawaa methodology to the states of forgiveness and favor, up to the human demands to be treated equally. Here the offensiveness and hostility become legal unless it becomes transgression and unfair offense, in some cases, comes to the command to fight. But in all cases and circumstances, hostility or offense are forbidden because war in Islam has its conditions but if Muslims are obliged, they will be unwilling to undergo it. The political Islamic movements have to have a comprehensive view of the Islamic values and shouldn’t deviate from the Islam’s principles by means that are detested by Islam. With special considerations to the local or international circumstances, that drived many movements to practice violence, but the future of these movements is conditioned by restoring the concept of Jihad and not confine it to fighting but should be concerned with amending the real issues and constrains because it is the way to maintain power if come with respecting the people’s interest and then grading up in the reformation tools and selecting more efficient and effective tools matching the age of the religion.
|