المستخلص: |
هدف هذا البحث إلى دراسة الرواة المبدعين في" الضعفاء الصغير" للإمام البخاري، وما ذكره في تراجمهم مقارنة بأقوال علماء الجرح والتعديل فيهم. وكان عدد هؤلاء الرواة اثنين وعشرين راويا، تفاوتوا مـن حيـث أخـذهم بالبدعـة مـا بـين راء لها ومعتقد وعامل وداعية ومتهم بها. أخرج أئمة الحديث للضـابطين مـنهم، وانتقـوا مـن أحـاديثهم مـا يتناسـب مـع حجـم مروياتهم، وما يوافق شروطهم ومناهجهم، وذكرت مـا لكـل راو مـن أحاديـث فـي الكتـب الستة. وكان اعتماد الأئمة في الرواية على صدق الـراوي وضـبطه لا علـى مذهبـه، ومـن ردوا روايته فلعدم ضبطه لا لبدعته، وإذا أضربوا عنه فلإخماد بدعته.
This research aims to study the distinguished narrators in al Bukhari's "al-Dhua'fa'a al-Saghir" for Imam al Bu kari and what he Mentioned in their translations with comparison of the opinions of the contests and adjustments saentist about them and those narrators were twenty two narrators they were variant in their adoption for what is called heterodoxy those narrators were between supportive for or belived or accused by this heterodoxy, so those Imams " leaders of prophetic tradition (Al Hadith) for justifiers of Al Hadith and chose from their hadith what is suitable with the size of their narrations and what is compatible with their rules, conditions and their curricula, and mentioned and what was behind. Every narrator of prophetic traditions In the six books and the reliance of those leaders of Al Hadith in the narration on the sincerity and the adjustment of the highest level of his doctrine and whom they rejected his narration Since his narration was not Jastified and not because of his heterodoxy and If they made strike upon him that because they would surpass his heterodoxy.
|