ارسل ملاحظاتك

ارسل ملاحظاتك لنا







BALANCED GOVERNMENT SECTOR REFORM : THE PATH TOWARDS RESULTS- ORIENTED GOVERNMENT (1)

المصدر: المجلة العلمية للاقتصاد والتجارة
الناشر: جامعة عين شمس - كلية التجارة
المؤلف الرئيسي: Ouda, Hassan A. G. (AUTH.)
المجلد/العدد: ع1
محكمة: نعم
الدولة: مصر
التاريخ الميلادي: 2014
الشهر: يناير
الصفحات: 109 - 161
ISSN: 2636-2562
رقم MD: 664649
نوع المحتوى: بحوث ومقالات
اللغة: الإنجليزية
قواعد المعلومات: EcoLink
مواضيع:
رابط المحتوى:
صورة الغلاف QR قانون

عدد مرات التحميل

25

حفظ في:
LEADER 03467nam a22002057a 4500
001 0061803
041 |a eng 
044 |b مصر 
100 |9 340968  |a Ouda, Hassan A. G.  |e AUTH. 
245 |a BALANCED GOVERNMENT SECTOR REFORM :   |b THE PATH TOWARDS RESULTS- ORIENTED GOVERNMENT (1) 
260 |b جامعة عين شمس - كلية التجارة  |c 2014  |g يناير 
300 |a 109 - 161 
336 |a بحوث ومقالات 
520 |b The old command-and-control system in the public administration system (bureaucratic management regime) gave the Public Sector Managers the message that risk would not be rewarded, that inefficiency would not be penalized, that what mattered most was complying with the current procedures, rules, and regulations. It did not matter what you did as long as you observed the rules. This means that accountability in the public (government) sector has traditionally been based on compliance with rules, regulations and procedures. Now, when the public sector is deregulated, a new results-based system is needed to hold managers accountable. This is a fundamental change: holding managers accountable for what they do, not how they do it. The public sector reform initiatives (especially the New Public management -NPM) have resulted in changing the accountability concept. From accountability in terms of procedural compliance to accountability in terms of efficiency and results (effectiveness and cost effectiveness). Accountability for results depends on clear objectives stated in measurable terms and on budgets showing the minimum results to be achieved. This must also be based on expenditure limits and on accounting and auditing systems that measure and report on actual results. Of course, this raises the desirability of accrual- based accounting, output-based budgeting (performance budgeting), result-based performance measurement and performance audit. In a nutshell, governments are requested to be Results-Oriented Governments. Accordingly, several countries have attempted to adopt the Results-Oriented Government in order to create value for money through focusing on results not on inputs, processes and compliance and focusing on creating value for available resources instead of spending the available resources. However, most of countries, especially the developing countries are currently using the traditional government systems such as: cash-based government accounting system, line item/traditional budgeting system, public administration system (bureaucratic management), traditional performance measurement system and traditional auditing systems. These systems are no longer able to provide the required information for an efficient and effective government and to enhance the efficient management of public resources. Therefore, the adoption of Results-Oriented Government needs to be based on a balanced public (government) sector reform that can facilitate the adoption of Results-Oriented Government. 
653 |a القطاع العام  |a الإصلاح الإداري  |a الحكومة الموجهة النتائج  |a الموظفون 
773 |4 الاقتصاد  |4 الإدارة  |6 Economics  |6 Management  |c 022  |e Scientific Journal for Economic & Commerce  |f Al-Maġallah Al-ʿilmiyyah Lil-Iqtiṣād Wal Tiğārah  |l 001  |m ع1  |o 0527  |s المجلة العلمية للاقتصاد والتجارة  |v 044  |x 2636-2562 
856 |u 0527-044-001-022.pdf 
930 |d y  |p y  |q y 
995 |a EcoLink 
999 |c 664649  |d 664649