ارسل ملاحظاتك

ارسل ملاحظاتك لنا







موجات الديمقراطية والربيع العربي: دراسة مقارنة

العنوان بلغة أخرى: Waves of Democracy and the Arab Spring: Comparative Study
المصدر: مجلة دراسات شرق أوسطية
الناشر: مركز دراسات الشرق الاوسط
المؤلف الرئيسي: البرصان، أحمد سليم (مؤلف)
المجلد/العدد: مج19, ع72
محكمة: نعم
الدولة: الأردن
التاريخ الميلادي: 2015
الشهر: صيف
الصفحات: 43 - 67
DOI: 10.12816/0016694
ISSN: 1811-8208
رقم MD: 720230
نوع المحتوى: بحوث ومقالات
اللغة: العربية
قواعد المعلومات: EcoLink, HumanIndex
مواضيع:
رابط المحتوى:
صورة الغلاف QR قانون

عدد مرات التحميل

83

حفظ في:
LEADER 03079nam a22002417a 4500
001 0111853
024 |3 10.12816/0016694 
041 |a ara 
044 |b الأردن 
100 |a البرصان، أحمد سليم  |g Al-Bursan, Ahmed Saleem  |e مؤلف  |9 81479 
245 |a موجات الديمقراطية والربيع العربي:   |b دراسة مقارنة 
246 |a Waves of Democracy and the Arab Spring:  |b Comparative Study 
260 |b مركز دراسات الشرق الاوسط  |c 2015  |g صيف 
300 |a 43 - 67 
336 |a بحوث ومقالات  |b Article 
520 |b The Arab Spring is considered an expansion of the democratic shift in the modern times and its fourth wave. The Arab peoples are not an exception of the current global political changes. History saw 2 public revolutions against totalitarianism in 1848 and 1989. Likewise, the Arab public uprisings of 2011 broke out in the face of dictatorships, which had lost their legitimacy, taking the shape of spontaneous protests calling for freedom, dignity, equality and social justice against oppression and corruption. The causes for these revolutions were similar to a certain extent in being against regimes without a legitimacy of achievement. In the three cases, they were surprising and fast in toppling the regimes, regardless of the ideological differences. Those of 1848 called for liberalism against dictatorship, those of 1989 rose against communist regimes and those of 2011 stood up against secular regimes. For the results, liberalism and capitalism managed to rule in the first and second cases respectively. However, in the third case, the public activity was without ideology, but the fall of the regimes led to a conflict between political Islam movements and secularist, liberal groups. In the case of 1989, external powers - especially the EU and US - supported the democratic shift in political, economic and media terms. However, the uprisings in the Arab Spring states were different in facing international, regional and national counter-revolution powers, employing the above tools to switch the course of the changes, mainly to exclude the Islamists from politics. The resulting conflict often reached a civil war in some of these countries. In conclusion, the lesson derived from those events is that there are always counter revolutions, which are often defeated - however powerful - by the revolutions. In their rule, the former repeats the failure of the previous dictatorships, which do not have achievements to mention. 
653 |a العلوم السياسية  |a الإنتفاضة الشعبية  |a الثورات العربية  |a الربيع العربى  |a الديمقراطية  |a التحول الديمقراطى 
773 |4 العلوم السياسية  |6 Political Science  |c 003  |e Middle East Studies Journal  |f Maǧallaẗ dirāsāt šarq awsaṭiyyaẗ  |l 072  |m مج19, ع72  |o 0836  |s مجلة دراسات شرق أوسطية  |v 019  |x 1811-8208 
856 |u 0836-019-072-003.pdf 
930 |d y  |p y  |q y 
995 |a EcoLink 
995 |a HumanIndex 
999 |c 720230  |d 720230