| LEADER |
04013nam a22002417a 4500 |
| 001 |
0138590 |
| 024 |
|
|
|3 10.36360/1560-004-001-011
|
| 041 |
|
|
|a ara
|
| 044 |
|
|
|b تركيا
|
| 100 |
|
|
|9 399406
|a أونيش، ضياء
|e مؤلف
|
| 245 |
|
|
|a تقاسم السلطة:
|b التحدي الذي يواجه التحول الديمقراطي في تركيا
|
| 246 |
|
|
|a Sharing Power:
|b Turkey’s Democratization Challenge in Theage of the AKP Hegemony
|
| 260 |
|
|
|b مركز الدراسات السياسية والاقتصادية والاجتماعية - ستا
|c 2015
|g ربيع
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a 149 - 171
|
| 336 |
|
|
|a بحوث ومقالات
|b Article
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a بعد موجة التحول الديمقراطي الكبرى على مدار العقد الماضي، جذب تأزم عملية الإصلاح في تركيا وتزايد المخاوف من 'التسلط الآخذ في الازدياد'، في ظل حكومة حزب العدالة والتنمية-انتباه العديد من العلماء. كيف تمكنت تركيا من إحراز تقدم بشأن إرساء الديمقراطية على مدار السنوات العشر الماضية؟ ولماذا فقدت الحكومة الحالية روحها الإصلاحية؟ يسعى هذا المقال للإجابة عن هذين السؤالين من خلال وضع نهج شامل متعدد الأبعاد، يحاول دمج الهياكل والجهات الفاعلة والقوى المحلية والخارجية، بدلا من التركيز على جوانب معينة والتقليل من شأن عناصر حيوية أخرى.
|
| 520 |
|
|
|b Afer a major wave of democratization over the last decade, the stalemate in Turkey’s reform process and the rising concerns about ‘creep-ing authoritarianism’ under the ruling AKP government attracted the at-tention of many scholars. How could Turkey manage to achieve substan-tial progress in democratization over the last ten years and why has the current government lost its reformist spirit? Tis article seeks to answer these questions by developing a multi-dimensional, holistic approach that tries to integrate structures and actors, domestic and external forces, rath-er than single mindedly focusing on certain aspects whilst downplaying other crucial elements from the perspective of comparative democratization studies Turkey con-stitutes an unusual case. It is an example of a “second wave” democracy.Te transition From the single party, soft-authoritarian regime of the in-ter-war period was accomplished several decades ago in the 1950s. Yet, in spite of major reform experiments, notably during the course of the early part of the past decade, democracy remains far from being consolidated. Indeed, inter-national comparisons such as data based on Freedom House Surveys tend toclassify Turkey as a “hybrid regime,” whose standing is signifcantly low com-pared to many third wave democracies in Latin America, Eastern Europe, and elsewhere. In retrospect, Turkey has succeeded in terms of establishing “elec-toral” or “procedural” democracy, but has failed in terms of generating “sub-stantive” democracy based on a genuinely pluralistic political order. Turkish society and politics remains deeply divided and there are increasing concerns voiced by liberal intellectuals both at home and abroad about the endurance of authoritarian elements in the Turkish political system, going even as far sug-gesting that the diferences between Erdoğan’s Turkey and Putin’s Russia may not be as clear-cut as they may have appeared only a few years ago
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a الإنتخابات المحلية
|a حزب العدالة و التنمية
|a الإصلاح السياسي
|a الديمقراطية
|a تركيا
|
| 773 |
|
|
|c 011
|f Rouya turkiyyah
|l 001
|m مج4, ع1
|o 1560
|s مجلة رؤية تركية
|t Turkish Vision Magazine
|v 004
|x 2458-8458
|
| 856 |
|
|
|u 1560-004-001-011.pdf
|
| 930 |
|
|
|d y
|p y
|q n
|
| 995 |
|
|
|a +HumanIndex
|
| 999 |
|
|
|c 758839
|d 758839
|
