ارسل ملاحظاتك

ارسل ملاحظاتك لنا







Evaluate Multifactor Asset Pricing Models to Explain Market Anomalies: Applicable Test in the Saudi Stock Market

المصدر: المجلة العربية للإدارة
الناشر: المنظمة العربية للتنمية الإدارية
المؤلف الرئيسي: Mahran, Sahar M. R. (Author)
مؤلفين آخرين: Heshmat, Nesma Ahmed (Co-Author)
المجلد/العدد: مج36, ع1
محكمة: نعم
الدولة: مصر
التاريخ الميلادي: 2016
الشهر: يونيو
الصفحات: 491 - 512
DOI: 10.21608/AJA.2016.17599
ISSN: 1110-5453
رقم MD: 789669
نوع المحتوى: بحوث ومقالات
اللغة: الإنجليزية
قواعد المعلومات: EcoLink
مواضيع:
كلمات المؤلف المفتاحية:
Asset pricing | book-to-market ratio | Cahart model | Fama and French three-factor model | the four-factor model of Chan and Faff four factor model
رابط المحتوى:
صورة الغلاف QR قانون

عدد مرات التحميل

20

حفظ في:
LEADER 02558nam a22002417a 4500
001 0165247
024 |3 10.21608/AJA.2016.17599 
041 |a eng 
044 |b مصر 
100 |a Mahran, Sahar M. R.  |e Author  |9 339745 
245 |a Evaluate Multifactor Asset Pricing Models to Explain Market Anomalies: Applicable Test in the Saudi Stock Market 
260 |b المنظمة العربية للتنمية الإدارية  |c 2016  |g يونيو 
300 |a 491 - 512 
336 |a بحوث ومقالات  |b Article 
520 |b This paper compares and evaluates the performance of eight different multifactor asset- pricing models to identify and explain Anomalies in Saudi stock market (SSM). Data set of daily stock prices and returns are collected for all companies that issue shares (152 companies) which represent all sectors in the S SM during the period from 2009 to 2013. The 25 size-BE/ME portfolios are formed by the intersection of size and BE/ME quintiles (5x5 Size-BE/ME sorts). The empirical results show that each of capital asset pricing models CAPM, the Fama-French three-factor model, the Cahart model, the four factor model of Chan and Faff four factor model and the five -factor model (Adding liquidity to four factor model) have coefficients of the factors (Bp, Sp, hp, wp and L ) to be significantly different from zero. Furthermore adjusted R2s range from 29% to 78% but all of them produce an intercept that is significantly different from zero for 12-16 portfolios. However, by adding leverage and test the six-factor asset pricing model, the evidence confirms the significance of this model to explain return variation with adjusted R2 ranges from 39% to 83% and the intercept are not significant for 17 portfolios out of 25. Moreover, the results of testing six-factor model by adding standard deviation of residual - provide supportive evidence to the six-factor model. 
653 |a السعودية  |a أسواق الأوراق المالية  |a الإدارة المالية 
692 |b Asset pricing  |b book-to-market ratio  |b Cahart model  |b Fama and French three-factor model  |b the four-factor model of Chan and Faff four factor model 
773 |4 الإدارة  |6 Management  |c 022  |e Arab Journal of Administration  |f Al-Mağallah Al-ʿArabiyyaẗ Lil-Īdārah  |l 001  |m مج36, ع1  |o 0345  |s المجلة العربية للإدارة  |v 036  |x 1110-5453 
700 |9 339743  |a Heshmat, Nesma Ahmed  |e Co-Author 
856 |u 0345-036-001-022.pdf  |n https://aja.journals.ekb.eg/article_17599.html 
930 |d y  |p y 
995 |a EcoLink 
999 |c 789669  |d 789669