المستخلص: |
The disassemble can make it as a knowing vitriol approach for the following causes:- 1- There is important faith discard , about how to select approach previously, with out applying it and formulate it previously, or approach has no value and can not discover it unless through practical operation? Scientists of knowledge split into two parts, so that can say that disassemble consider an approach within second opinion. 2- It is right that duraida did not say about methodic in exact meaning, but if people still reading his works and discuss it and affected by it, so absolutely they will treat it as a theory that have it is own precepts and analytic methods. Until Christopher Norris go to treat disassemble by describing it an open invitation for new forms consider a clear harming in the right of exactly what texts of duraida have. 3- Duraida did not draw for disassemble specific approach within frame gnostic, but we can touch methodic disassemble through the essays Erich worked on in it duraida, or consider the understructure for disassemble. The reasons and factor has worked and embodying in political thinking of European politionian and produced the current political system who dedicate special centralization of his own , so Europe looks like it is the central of civilization and economic center and the political and military approach who cannot accept the competition and cannot take it and consider in direct and indirect way that it is the best prototype that should follow it and all this led create the legend of white man and his success.
|