| المستخلص: |
This study dealt with four annotations of AlJumal book of AlJurjani, which is Mukhtasar Jami in Grammar, and these four annotations are the research subject: annotating sentences (AlJumal) in Grammar by AlJurjani himself in (H), AlMurtajil for annotating sentences by Ibn AlKhashshab in (H), with pointing out the ills in ALKhawarizmi 'annotation of AlJumal (sentences) in (617 H), and AlFakher fi Sharh Jumal Abd AlQahir (AlFaher in annotating sentences of Abd AlQahir) by AlBaali in (H). The research depended on the method of analyzing and balancing among annotations in the method, sources, limits, idioms, disagreement, and doctrine and etc. The study has been divided into six sections, preceded by a preamble, in which I defined book of AlJumal by AlJurjani, and the four commentators of this book, and in the first section, I mentioned the methods of the commentators in annotating sentences, and their style in annotating, and as per division and organization, briefing and expansion in annotation, and in the second section: I talked about their sources in annotation as per scholars and books, in addition to the third section in which addressed the grammatical origins of commentators (Hearing, Qiyas, Ijma', Istishab), and in the fourth section, talking about idioms, limits, factors and ills of the commentators, and in the fifth section, I mentioned their attitudes towards the grammatical doctrines, and their grammatical doctrine, besides, in the sixth section, I mentioned the virtues and drawbacks in the annotations. The study has been concluded to conclusions and recommendations, the most important conclusions: that the four annotations show, by striking balance, aspects of agreement and aspects of difference as per the method in which the commentators followed. The most important recommendations: working on the enrichment of the Arabian library with these comparisons between scholars and their annotations.
|
