المصدر: | مجلة المواقف |
---|---|
الناشر: | جامعة مصطفى اسطمبولي - كلية العلوم الإنسانية والاجتماعية |
المؤلف الرئيسي: | Gobillot, Geneviève (Author) |
المجلد/العدد: | ع2 |
محكمة: | نعم |
الدولة: |
الجزائر |
التاريخ الميلادي: |
2008
|
الشهر: | أفريل |
الصفحات: | 5 - 18 |
ISSN: |
1112-7872 |
رقم MD: | 839209 |
نوع المحتوى: | بحوث ومقالات |
قواعد المعلومات: | HumanIndex |
مواضيع: | |
رابط المحتوى: |
الناشر لهذه المادة لم يسمح بإتاحتها. |
المستخلص: |
koranic verses concerning the a Drogauon were not considered, during the centuries, in the same way by all the commentators. If the most common interpretation was that the Koran declares to orerrule itself in precise cases, in particular to cut legal questions, certain number of authors gave completely different explanations. The last ones, among whom at least a muctazilite, Abu Muslim Muhammad b. Bahr al-Isfaham al-Muctazili, m. 322/934, were persuaded that die abrogation does not concern the koranic text itself, but the revealed texts previous (Torah, Gospel) Having exposed the arguments, little known, of the commentators who adopted this thesis, we notice, thanks to an intercultural and intertextual reading of the concerned passages, that they seam to have had the understanding the closest to the real meaning of the koranic text. We show, to finish, by means of the intercultural reading of the another verse (2, 256), considered as overruled by Abu-l-Hasan cAli b. Ahmad al-Wahidi al-Nisaburi, in his book Asbdb al-nuzul wa-al-nasikh wa-l-mansukh, among others, that a just understanding of the koranic notion of abrogation restores a more solid status in verses relative to the dialogue between the religions. |
---|---|
ISSN: |
1112-7872 |