| المستخلص: |
ينماز النص القرآني من بين جميع النصوص الأخرى أدبية كانت أم علمية أم تاريخية بإعجازه الخاص وبقدسيته، الأمر الذي شغل بال الكثير من النحاة واللغويين على مدى العصور لذا نرى الكثير من الدراسات قد وجهت بأنظارها صوب النص القرآني، ومن هذا الباب جاءت فكرة دراسة أسلوب النفي في سورة التوبة من أجل البحث عن جماليات جديدة في ذلك النص سواء أكان النص منفي أم غير منفي، ثم تسليط الضوء على سبب استخدام أسلوب نفي معين دون غيره من الأساليب أو العدول عن أداة نافية إلى أخرى ومعرفة ما هي الفروق الدقيقة بين تلك الأدوات، لاسيما هناك من ينادي بجمال الجملة الاسمية المنفية دون الجملة الفعلية المنفية إلا أن كلتا الجملتين لهما جمالهما الخاص داخل النص القرآني وبعدها التعرف على أنوع النفي الصريح منه والضمني ثم الحديث عن طرق انتقاض النفي داخل النص القرآني.
It is undoubtable that the Quranic text is a miraculous text many Arabic scholars all over the globe. And this is derived from its special organization and its methods of composition. For this reason, I took it upon myself to study one of the language’s methods within a Quranic text to uncover more of that beauty. Therefore, I chose the negation methods in Surat At-Tawba, especially for there are so many who are ignorant of these methods and the slight differences between them. This study consists of an introduction that included a defining Surat At-Tawba. Then, the first section included defining the negation methods and their types, then it shed light on direct negation and its tools. Then, the second section moved to mention the methods negation is negated, and then the study was sealed with a conclusion. I have found that negation existed with both of its types, proper and implied negation, and all the negation tools were used except for (lat – لات), and the (la – لا) tool was the most frequently used tool, whereas the (in – إن ) was the least used tool. The verb (lays – ليس) was only mentioned once. As for the implied negation, it was mentioned in a variety of ways such as (Subhan – سبحان), and using the verbs (kad, aba, kariha –,كره كاد أبى). However, as for the negated negation, it was done with both proper negation and implied negation and in different ways such as the employment of the Exception tool (Innama, Ella – إنما، إلا). And through the use of question and this is what happened with the negation tool (lam – لم) and the questioning tool (hamzah – همزة). And this where the negation was out of its track and was turned into affirmation instead of negation.
|
