| المستخلص: |
Egypt presents an interesting case of Media freedom in that it is an example of a country in which the government, which had been in power for 29 years under a continued state of emergency, attempts to place legal impediments to restrict the Egyptian media, but does not completely succeed in stifling media freedom. While the government has shown itself willing to use the emergency law, harsh press laws and other aspects of the penal code to intimidate, arrest, and imprison journalists, it cannot entirely limit access to information within the country. This is partly because of the persistence of Egypt’s journalists and bloggers, who continued to push the envelope by taking on topics that were taboo in the past, and partly because of the country’s desire to expand economic growth, Allowing its citizens greater access to different IT. On February 11, 2011, President Hosni Mubarak resigned from the presidency after 29 years in power. Technologies in this Egyptian revolution become a trendy topic. However, lots of concerns have been widely expressed about what has been termed as chaos in media organizations in Egypt& the questions remained: How Egypt political transition to a more democratic system will have major implications for promoting freedom of expression & freedom of speech?. How could we interpret new incidents like blocking “Aljazeera Misr” or the case of a blogger who was handed a jail sentence for criticizing the army? Maikel Nabil, 26, was charged with insulting the military establishment and “spreading false information". There’ fore this study tends to offer a scientific attempt to monitor the most important constraints and pressures that impact negatively the freedom of Egyptian media after the revolution through examining media practitioner’s attitudes towards Media Freedom in Egypt within a wider framework of transitology theory assumptions.
|
