ارسل ملاحظاتك

ارسل ملاحظاتك لنا







الخلاف في حقيقة المباح: دراسة أصولية

العنوان بلغة أخرى: Divergence of Opinions on the Nature of the Permissible: A Textual Study
المصدر: الدراسات الإسلامية
الناشر: الجامعة الإسلامية العالمية - مجمع البحوث الاسلامية
المؤلف الرئيسي: أمين، شمس الحق (مؤلف)
المجلد/العدد: مج52, ع2
محكمة: نعم
الدولة: باكستان
التاريخ الميلادي: 2017
التاريخ الهجري: 1438
الشهر: يونيو
الصفحات: 147 - 197
رقم MD: 903129
نوع المحتوى: بحوث ومقالات
اللغة: العربية
قواعد المعلومات: IslamicInfo
مواضيع:
رابط المحتوى:
صورة الغلاف QR قانون
حفظ في:
المستخلص: All rules of the Shari‘ah in general and permissible in particular occupy a prominent position in Islamic jurisprudence. The category of the permissible (mubah) has been discussed in many disciplines of the Islamic literature such as jurisprudence, scholasticism and legal maxims. A number of schools from the main stream, mu‘tazila and khawarij have differed on its nature and interpretation in their respective discourses as to whether the permissible is hukm shar‘i or is it even a hukm? What about husn and qubh of mubah, whether the original rule for all things was permissibility? Those who are not familiar with the principles of Islamic jurisprudence are often confused by such disagreements. This paper tries to investigate the nature and causes of the afore-mentioned diversity in the light of the original texts and its practical implications. It is a modest attempt to identify the areas of disagreement and to explain the existing difference of opinion in an analytical way.

عناصر مشابهة