ارسل ملاحظاتك

ارسل ملاحظاتك لنا







The Role Of Criminal Legislations In Fighting Against The Esignature Related Crimes : A Comparative Study

المصدر: مجلة العلوم القانونية والسياسية
الناشر: الجمعية العلمية للبحوث والدراسات الاستراتيجية
المؤلف الرئيسي: Abu Rukba, Ramy Omar Theeb (Author)
المجلد/العدد: س9, ع2
محكمة: نعم
الدولة: العراق
التاريخ الميلادي: 2019
الشهر: حزيران
الصفحات: 159 - 245
ISSN: 2222-7288
رقم MD: 962189
نوع المحتوى: بحوث ومقالات
اللغة: الإنجليزية
قواعد المعلومات: IslamicInfo, EcoLink
مواضيع:
كلمات المؤلف المفتاحية:
E-Signature | Penal Protection | Signature-Related Crime
رابط المحتوى:
صورة الغلاف QR قانون

عدد مرات التحميل

14

حفظ في:
LEADER 02573nam a22002297a 4500
001 1706140
041 |a eng 
044 |b العراق 
100 |9 518157  |a Abu Rukba, Ramy Omar Theeb  |e Author 
245 |a The Role Of Criminal Legislations In Fighting Against The Esignature Related Crimes :  |b A Comparative Study 
260 |b الجمعية العلمية للبحوث والدراسات الاستراتيجية  |c 2019  |g حزيران 
300 |a 159 - 245 
336 |a بحوث ومقالات  |b Article 
520 |b The present study aimed to shed a light on the e-signature-related crimes under the Egyptian, Saudi, and Jordanian laws. The researcher selected this subject because the e-signature has become essential for conducting legal transactions and exchanging data and information between people. If the e-signature is considered a secure and reliable from people’s perspective, the problems associated with it shall decrease. Penal protection for one’s e-signature related rights can be provided through criminalizing the acts that may reduce the reliability and admissibility of the e-signature as a mean of proof. Providing such protection shall make the parties who use e-signature feel that this signature is a reliable method for concluding transactions regardless of the space separating them. For instance, enforcing the Jordanian electronic transactions law has facilitated the use of electronic means for concluding transactions. However, the latter law doesn’t criminalize the crimes related to e-transactions in general nor the ones related to e-signature in particular. Similar to the Egyptian and Saudi legislators, the Jordanian legislator should provide special penal protection for the rights related to e-transactions and e-signatures through the Jordanian electronic transactions law. For instance, the Egyptian and Saudi legislators have criminalized some acts that are considered e-signature-related crimes. 
653 |a القانون الجنائي  |a التوقيع الإلكتروني  |a الحماية الجنائية  |a الجريمة والمجرمون 
692 |b E-Signature  |b Penal Protection  |b Signature-Related Crime 
773 |4 القانون  |4 العلوم السياسية  |6 Law  |6 Political Science  |c 015  |f Maǧallaẗ al-ʿulūm al-qānūniyyaẗ wa-al-siyāsiyyaẗ  |l 002  |m س9, ع2  |o 0898  |s مجلة العلوم القانونية والسياسية  |t Journal of Legal and Political Sciences  |v 009  |x 2222-7288 
856 |u 0898-009-002-015.pdf 
930 |d y  |p y 
995 |a IslamicInfo 
995 |a EcoLink 
999 |c 962189  |d 962189 

عناصر مشابهة