| LEADER |
02692nam a22002177a 4500 |
| 001 |
1747153 |
| 024 |
|
|
|3 10.33193/JALHSS.40.25
|
| 041 |
|
|
|a eng
|
| 044 |
|
|
|b الإمارات
|
| 100 |
|
|
|9 542461
|a Jaber, Asmaa Hussain
|e Author
|
| 245 |
|
|
|a The Effectiveness of Using Correction Techniques on the Achievement of Iraqi Collage learners in Punctuation Marks Accuracy
|
| 260 |
|
|
|b كلية الإمارات للعلوم التربوية
|c 2019
|g يوليو
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a 374 - 389
|
| 336 |
|
|
|a بحوث ومقالات
|b Article
|
| 520 |
|
|
|b Similar to any additional learning condition, In essence, a second language student must first receive feedback on even their own achievement, so therefore, This work explores the general influence of instructor-correction, peer-correction and personal correction techniques of Iraqi college students ' punctuation mark efficiency. The Teacher- correction group obtained correction and tacit coding responses from the instructor and the peer-correction group-obtained correction and tacit coding responses from their colleagues; whereas these group members themselves corrected and edited their work in the self-correction group. The study samples second-year participants studied at the College of Imam Al-Kadhum, Department of English mainly consisting of two hundred (200) second-year students in the academic year of 2018/2019. This experiment was attended by a group of (120) learners, comprising of four classes of thirty-three (33). At the start of the term, all the participants took pretests and then engaged in a 6-week activity in which they had distinct feedback techniques. The post-test one-way ANOVA findings showed a substantial distinction between the accomplishment of the three groups. The Scheffe Test results showed a significant difference between instructor-correction and personal-correction groups and between instructor-correction and peer correction groups. The verdict of this assessment is that groups of peer-correction and self-correction show better teaching performance relative to the conventional group of teacher-correction, and peercorrection serves as the best feedback method.
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a التقنيات الحديثة
|a التعلم الذاتي
|a الجامعات العراقية
|a تصحيح الأقران
|
| 773 |
|
|
|4 الادب
|6 Literature
|c 025
|e Journal of Arts, Literature, Humanities and Sociology Sciences
|f Mağallaẗ al-funūn wa-al-adab wa-ʿulūm al-insāniyyāt wa-al-iğtimāʿ
|l 040
|m ع40
|o 1889
|s مجلة الفنون والأدب وعلوم الإنسانيات والاجتماع
|v 000
|x 2616-3810
|
| 856 |
|
|
|u 1889-000-040-025.pdf
|
| 930 |
|
|
|d y
|p y
|q n
|
| 995 |
|
|
|a +HumanIndex
|
| 999 |
|
|
|c 1005525
|d 1005525
|
