| المستخلص: |
George Clemenceau is one of the influential figures in the course of world events not only in French but also he is one of the most prominent politicians who have impact on the events of the modern and contemporary history which had kept his name and nations name and made his glory among the great people he controlled to a large extent on the formulation of Republic affairs in France and the world. As a result his popularity increased in his country and the world beyond what distinguishes him from the different ideas and principles this shaped his character as a radical republican because he was born in an environment that embraced the concepts of the republic and formed the opposition for all Royal systems. He did not however depend on the legacy of his family; he depended on himself and imposed himself firmly on the political area through his views and political speeches in the parliament and outside. Therefore his enemies feared him while the politicians of the world respected him, he defended his country wherever the man of the street in France because he led his country in the years of the first world war until the opponent politicians realized that he is the best ruler of the country through the war, since he does not believe in the surrender because he believes that the settlement must be from a position of strength until achieving the complete victory. In addition to the political geniuses he was a military man from the first class and this permanent motto is (the war is not easy and cannot be left the military commanders) , he ruled France by the power and he achieved the victory to his country and became the national hero and then he reached to the climax of his political life. In spite of all what has been mentioned the Reed and Iraqi academic studies did not mention him in detail hence the importance of the study to the character and the year 1841 namely is the starting of the study because this year is the year of Georges Clemenceau's birth 1841 and the year 1919 considered the end of the study for this year is his retirement from politics generally.
The study consists of four chapters introduction, and a conclusion. The Chapter one involved his life and political activity (1841-1874). His life, his family, and his teaching. The Chapter two involved his parliamentary activity from (1875-1902) and his entry to the parliament to represent the opposition and the retirement from politics. Chapter three involved his political and administrative activities from (1909-1914). While chapter four Presented and his role in the first world war and his receiving the ministry during the difficult conditions of the country. And his role in Versailles conference (1919). The study found the following results. The environment in which a significant role in the refinement of his republic personality and grew up making political future of the family is known for its opposition to the royal , the ancestors of the top republicans who have embraced the principles of the French revolution since its inception and one of the most aggrieved at the catholic which is based on the imperial system and depending on the prevailing conditions and the policy of arbitrary the Napoleon III, So it seemed to gravitate toward political work since the early stage. In the Mean while the war clouds began over France, and he felt it. He welcomed the war and wished the defeat to his enemies and the regime that he hated since his child hood in order to starting new regime ruled France through controlling the republican elements. He was surprised by the emergence of two trends, each claimed adherence to the principles of the free republic that the moderate movement won. And the initially espoused against the other party extremist but eventually became one of the strongest opponents of the policy of colonial and religious trends until he was expelled from power and took after them the radical republicans the regime. Because of him, the radical republicans established to year 1940 after the fall by Germans. He was with very interested in social problems from that is was suffering the society. He was a supporter of labor strikes and improved the conditions of the working classes, the elimination of poverty and he appeared as advocate social reform. But the relation stressed between them during took over the ministry of interior against strikes in the estranged and began machinations against him. And they objected to took over the prime minister again, He united the military leader ship of allied armies in the war and then achieved the victory against the German who threatened on the democracy principles.
|
